introduce td.constructor() as top-level API sibling to td.object() & td.function() #201
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fortunately 2.0.0 is in preview, because I just realized this morning how horrible of an impedance mismatch I've created by having
td.object()
accept constructor functions and returning fake constructors.How it used to work
This is how we got here
td.object() would return a function bag by inspecting the constructor you pass it.
That changed!
And now in 2.0 when you pass a constructor to td.object, you get a fake constructor with test double functions on the prototype.
Changes in this PR:
td.constructor(['bark'])