New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: use json payloads #34
Merged
mxinden
merged 11 commits into
testground:master
from
laurentsenta:fix/issue-33-json-payloads
Aug 1, 2022
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d0d6a7d
src/responses: use a json payload response
laurentsenta 2062388
src/client: publish with json
laurentsenta 2d83ec7
CHANGELOG: note for PR 34
laurentsenta e579285
examples/example: add publish demonstration
laurentsenta d234386
src/requests: rename Payload::JSON to Json
laurentsenta c180388
examples/example: fix the Cow converstion
laurentsenta ae04c00
src/responses: add custom json deserializer
laurentsenta 6712d35
src/responses: fix test and simplify deserialization
laurentsenta cd8b9a0
test: introduce publish-subscribe example & test
laurentsenta 94bfd55
src/responses: style comment
laurentsenta c760054
examples/example: drop publish on example
laurentsenta File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With the suggestion above, we would only do the following patch here:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you share the benefits you see?
My thinking might be "tainted" by the go-sdk but I think defaulting to JSON is a good thing:
For what it's worth, it looks like there is a type issue in the API that makes it confusing, but we don't have to leak this on the user side:
https://github.com/testground/sync-service/blob/d3e9e3e56403ed994f350942813d3d8aa746debc/types.go#L21
https://github.com/testground/sync-service/blob/d3e9e3e56403ed994f350942813d3d8aa746debc/types.go#L69
(string response)