Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

give PipeResolver a new JitReflector if available #47

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2017
Merged

give PipeResolver a new JitReflector if available #47

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2017

Conversation

tflori
Copy link
Owner

@tflori tflori commented Jun 22, 2017

For backward compatibility we use import * and check if there exists a JitReflector.

This will solve #46

@tflori
give PipeResolver a new JitReflector if available
e3e720e 
For backward compatibility we use `import *` and check if there exists
a JitReflector.
@tflori tflori self-assigned this Jun 22, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling e3e720e on fix-pipeResolver into 5d3a63f on master.

@tflori tflori merged commit 24f70a8 into master Jun 22, 2017
@tflori tflori deleted the fix-pipeResolver branch June 22, 2017 04:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@tflori tflori

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@tflori @coveralls