Remove Ambiguity in the README #11
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 3 commits
June 23, 2020 13:29
Instead of nuking this repo, I have proposed a change in the README stating that this software can be inaccurate as well. I would extend this change into the repo and it should close #4, resolve #1, and hopefully keep the repo up because this code is really interesting and I would hate to see it removed.
|
Pinging @tg-bomze: this pull-request is not a troll pull-request. Unlike the other two which suggested defacing everything for uneducated and illogical reasons, it should not be ignored in my opinion. It would keep the trolls coming from social media away. |
|
This is more or less the same commit as this one in the original PULSE repository. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Instead of nuking this repo, I have proposed a change in the README stating that this software can be inaccurate as well.
I would extend this change into the repo and it should close #4, resolve #1, and hopefully keep the repo up because this code is really interesting and I would hate to see it removed.