Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Centralize all RBD related shell cmds and logging #529

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2017

Conversation

codenrhoden
Copy link
Contributor

Make sure that all calls made using rbd/rados binaries use a command
method for execution, and that the related logging and error reporting
is standardized.

Generated new rbd.test and ran suite. All tests pass (unless debugging is enabled, see #528).

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 30, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #529 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #529   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.53%   28.53%           
=======================================
  Files          34       34           
  Lines        1994     1994           
=======================================
  Hits          569      569           
  Misses       1364     1364           
  Partials       61       61

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c78eb9e...f492189. Read the comment docs.

Make sure that all calls made using rbd/rados binaries use a command
method for execution, and that the related logging and error reporting
is standardized.
@codenrhoden codenrhoden added this to the 2017.04 milestone May 1, 2017
@codenrhoden codenrhoden added the rbd label May 1, 2017
@akutz akutz merged commit 44a5d1c into thecodeteam:master May 1, 2017
@codenrhoden codenrhoden deleted the bugfix/ceph_cmd_stderr branch June 26, 2017 18:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
3 participants