-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Monitoring guide #2407
Monitoring guide #2407
Conversation
442eb01
to
8f16d2f
Compare
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_enabling-access-to-metrics-via-web-ui.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
8f16d2f
to
5532c86
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just some comments from a quick look.
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_configuring-pcp-data-collection.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
+ | ||
[options="nowrap", subs="verbatim,quotes,attributes"] | ||
---- | ||
# {foreman-installer} --foreman-telemetry-prometheus-enabled true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This runs the installer multiple times. Would it be good to only run it once, saving time?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FIXME: make the installer quicker 😝
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_configuring-pcp-data-collection.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_installing-pcp-packages.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_installing-pcp-packages.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Will we need a note somehow in the Upgrade guide about what to do if PCP monitoring is present? |
Why? Because services and thus data might be unavailable? I don't think it's a problem, but didn't test this much yet. |
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/con_performance-co-pilot.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/con_performance-metrics-domain-agents.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_configuring-pcp-data-collection.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_confirming-data-storage-usage.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_installing-pcp-packages.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_retrieving-archived-metrics-using-cli.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_retrieving-archived-metrics-using-cli.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_retrieving-live-metrics-using-cli.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_verifying-pcp-configuration.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_retrieving-metrics-via-web-ui.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_retrieving-live-metrics-using-cli.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_retrieving-archived-metrics-using-cli.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@maximiliankolb @mjivraja @Lennonka @asteflova this is now ready for a review :) |
ff9c073
to
d80b0c8
Compare
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/con_performance-co-pilot.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_installing-pcp-packages.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_identifying-available-metrics.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_identifying-available-metrics.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_identifying-available-metrics.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/doc-Monitoring_Project/topics/proc_enabling-access-to-telemery-data-via-the-web-ui.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
0cbb4a9
to
565ed01
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Assuming that everything is technically correct, I'm adding a couple of suggestions.
I see that the guide might use significant structural improvements, which is kinda complex to describe step by step.
How about we merge it more-or-less "as is", then I would suggest the further structural improvements in a new PR, and we continue the review then?
@evgeni Would you be okay with that?
<title>Monitoring Red Hat Satellite</title> | ||
<productname>Red Hat Satellite</productname> | ||
<productnumber>6.14</productnumber> | ||
<subtitle>Collecting metrics from Red Hat Satellite 6</subtitle> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
<subtitle>Collecting metrics from Red Hat Satellite 6</subtitle> | |
<subtitle>Collect metrics from Satellite and analyze the metrics in an external/third-party monitoring application/tool</subtitle> |
@evgeni We have just unified the subtitles for all guides to use this form, which demonstrates the contents of the guide. Can you please use it and fine tune the details? Not sure if my suggestion is technically correct, it's an example rather.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
aye. shortened yours a bit, lemme know what you think
Also, we need to cherry-pick this. I'm adding cherry-picks to 3.7+. |
No. Several features used in here are not in 3.7, and some are also not in 3.8. As of now, this is strictly 3.9+ |
+1 Rather than make Evgeni implement all our nerdy doc style improvements, it would be better to have one of the writers take over to do some editing. As long as the PR is okay from a technical perspective, it's perfectly fine to be merged into master/3.9. |
565ed01
to
4274cd3
Compare
Thanks Evgeni! I agree with Lena/Anet and think it's fair game to merge as is to "master" and make style adjustments later on. ✌️ |
4274cd3
to
7f88a03
Compare
I think I've addressed all comments from Lena and I do agree that merging it as-is and then do style fixes later seems like a good approach. |
Co-authored-by: Maximilian Kolb <kolb@atix.de>
7f88a03
to
1976061
Compare
(force push was squash only) |
Feel free to merge @Lennonka |
This is a port of the old "Monitoring Satellite" guide. Draft because:
Please cherry-pick my commits into: