Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RH-supported SCAP contents #2627

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 7, 2023
Merged

RH-supported SCAP contents #2627

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 7, 2023

Conversation

Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor

@Lennonka Lennonka commented Dec 6, 2023 •
edited

RHEL hosts have to be scanned with a supported SCAP content, which is the SSG designated for the minor RHEL version.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (planned Satellite 6.15)
  • Foreman 3.8/Katello 4.10
  • Foreman 3.7/Katello 4.9 (Satellite 6.14)
  • Foreman 3.6/Katello 4.8
  • Foreman 3.5/Katello 4.7 (Satellite 6.13; orcharhino 6.6)
  • Foreman 3.4/Katello 4.6 (EL8 only)
  • Foreman 3.3/Katello 4.5 on EL7 & EL8 (Satellite 6.12 on EL8 only; orcharhino 6.4/6.5 on EL8 only)
  • Foreman 3.2/Katello 4.4 on EL7 & EL8
  • Foreman 3.1/Katello 4.3 on EL7 & EL8 (Satellite 6.11 EL7/8; orcharhino 6.3 on EL7/8)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.1.

@Lennonka Lennonka added the Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective label Dec 6, 2023
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2023 •
edited

The PR preview for 85887d7 is available at theforeman-foreman-documentation-preview-pr-2627.surge.sh

The following output files are affected by this PR:

show diff

show diff as HTML

adamlazik1
adamlazik1 approved these changes Dec 7, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@adamlazik1 adamlazik1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM stylewise.

@Lennonka Lennonka added the style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective label Dec 7, 2023
@ares
Copy link
Member

ares commented Dec 7, 2023

thumbs up content wise

@Lennonka Lennonka added tech review done No issues from the technical perspective and removed Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective labels Dec 7, 2023
@Lennonka Lennonka merged commit f16c6cb into theforeman:master Dec 7, 2023
8 checks passed
Lennonka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2023
@Lennonka
RH-supported SCAP contents (#2627)
cf8a3cb 
RHEL hosts have to be scanned with a supported SCAP content,
which is the SSG designated for the minor RHEL version.
Lennonka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2023
@Lennonka
RH-supported SCAP contents (#2627)
7e66ebe 
RHEL hosts have to be scanned with a supported SCAP content,
which is the SSG designated for the minor RHEL version.
Lennonka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2023
@Lennonka
RH-supported SCAP contents (#2627)
acfe650 
RHEL hosts have to be scanned with a supported SCAP content,
which is the SSG designated for the minor RHEL version.
Lennonka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2023
@Lennonka
RH-supported SCAP contents (#2627)
fa93011 
RHEL hosts have to be scanned with a supported SCAP content,
which is the SSG designated for the minor RHEL version.
Lennonka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2023
@Lennonka
RH-supported SCAP contents (#2627)
96bfb89 
RHEL hosts have to be scanned with a supported SCAP content,
which is the SSG designated for the minor RHEL version.
Lennonka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2023
@Lennonka
RH-supported SCAP contents (#2627)
7b90113 
RHEL hosts have to be scanned with a supported SCAP content,
which is the SSG designated for the minor RHEL version.
Lennonka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2023
@Lennonka
RH-supported SCAP contents (#2627)
5e20108 
RHEL hosts have to be scanned with a supported SCAP content,
which is the SSG designated for the minor RHEL version.
Lennonka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2023
@Lennonka
RH-supported SCAP contents (#2627)
5e77e32 
RHEL hosts have to be scanned with a supported SCAP content,
which is the SSG designated for the minor RHEL version.
Lennonka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2023
@Lennonka
RH-supported SCAP contents (#2627)
9c55679 
RHEL hosts have to be scanned with a supported SCAP content,
which is the SSG designated for the minor RHEL version.
@Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor Author

Lennonka commented Dec 7, 2023 •
edited

Cherry-picked:

Lennonka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2023
@Lennonka
fixup! RH-supported SCAP contents (#2627)
c40c98b
Lennonka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2023
@Lennonka
fixup! RH-supported SCAP contents (#2627)
778d34f
Lennonka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2023
@Lennonka
fixup! RH-supported SCAP contents (#2627)
9768bdd
Lennonka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2023
@Lennonka
fixup! RH-supported SCAP contents (#2627)
11a815f
Lennonka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2023
@Lennonka
fixup! RH-supported SCAP contents (#2627)
e516d46
ianballou pushed a commit to ianballou/foreman-documentation that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2023
@Lennonka @ianballou
RH-supported SCAP contents (theforeman#2627)
43a2440 
RHEL hosts have to be scanned with a supported SCAP content,
which is the SSG designated for the minor RHEL version.
ianballou pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
@Lennonka @ianballou
RH-supported SCAP contents (#2627)
6c0c448 
RHEL hosts have to be scanned with a supported SCAP content,
which is the SSG designated for the minor RHEL version.
@Lennonka Lennonka deleted the SAT-18681-rhsupported-scap branch January 25, 2024 18:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@adamlazik1 adamlazik1 adamlazik1 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective tech review done No issues from the technical perspective
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@Lennonka @ares @adamlazik1