Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #36189 - Add AlmaLinux UEFI provisioning support #9648

Merged

Conversation

omenos
Copy link
Contributor

@omenos omenos commented Mar 10, 2023

This is a bit-for-bit copy of #9295, modified for AlmaLinux.

In pxegrub2_chainload.erb various paths are tried, but the /EFI/almalinux/grubx64.efi path is missing. This causes the server to refuse to boot.

To make it easier to use the AlmaLinux installation medium is added.

@theforeman-bot
Copy link
Member

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

2 similar comments
@theforeman-bot
Copy link
Member

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@theforeman-bot
Copy link
Member

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@theforeman-bot
Copy link
Member

Issues: #36189

In pxegrub2_chainload.erb various paths are tried, but the
/EFI/almalinux/grubx64.efi path is missing. This causes the server
to refuse to boot.

To make it easier to use the AlmaLinux installation medium is added.
@omenos omenos force-pushed the 36189-almalinux-uefi-chainload branch from 9e7f002 to dc9c885 Compare March 10, 2023 00:15
@ekohl
Copy link
Member

ekohl commented Mar 10, 2023

ok to test

Copy link
Member

@ekohl ekohl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me and I kicked of CI. @stejskalleos mind having a look?

@stejskalleos stejskalleos self-assigned this Mar 13, 2023
@stejskalleos
Copy link
Contributor

Code changes LGTM too, but I am still struggling with the setup of the environment for UEFI & HTTP provisioning. When I'll have it I will test it and merge the PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@stejskalleos stejskalleos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🍏 LGTM

I haven't tested it because still couldn't manage to find time to configure my setup,
however it looks sensible and does same as #9295, so let's get this in.

@stejskalleos stejskalleos merged commit 29e1c27 into theforeman:develop Jun 8, 2023
@stejskalleos
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @omenos and everyone!

@omenos
Copy link
Contributor Author

omenos commented Jun 8, 2023

@ekohl @stejskalleos @Conan-Kudo

Thanks for the reviews and merging!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
5 participants