New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes #24101 - execute confine for puppet3 check for sat 6.4 #197
Fixes #24101 - execute confine for puppet3 check for sat 6.4 #197
Conversation
Issues: #24101 |
@@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ class PreUpgradeCheck < Abstract | |||
def compose | |||
add_steps(find_checks(:default)) | |||
add_steps(find_checks(:pre_upgrade)) | |||
add_steps(find_checks(:puppet_upgrade_guide)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think, this check should be before validating repositories so moved line above repo. validate check.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If upgrade path goes from sat 6.4 to sat 6.4.z, never like from sat 6.3 to sat 6.4.z then we don't need it in sat 6.4.z scenario. But here, it is needed for sat 6.4.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@iNecas,
Still I think, it may happen that upgrade path from sat 6.3.z to sat 6.4.z so would like to know your suggestion on this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it should probably not be in 6.4.z, but only in 6.4 (upgrading from 6.3)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @iNecas.
Updated PR with this modification.
761cf3a
to
3290ff9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good
Thanks @kgaikwad and @ntkathole |
No description provided.