Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates for modulesync. #45

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 8, 2015
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
32 changes: 26 additions & 6 deletions .gitignore
@@ -1,16 +1,36 @@
.vagrant
# This file is managed centrally by modulesync
# https://github.com/theforeman/foreman-installer-modulesync

## MAC OS
.DS_Store

## TEXTMATE
*.tmproj
tmtags

## EMACS
*~
\#*
.\#*

## VIM
*.swp
*.swo
tags

## Bundler
Gemfile.lock
.bundle
vendor/

pkg/

Gemfile.lock

## rbenv / rvm
.rbenv*
.rvmrc*
.ruby-version
.ruby-*

## rspec
spec/fixtures/

## Puppet module
pkg/
coverage/
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions .puppet-lint.rc
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
--fail-on-warnings
--no-80chars-check
--no-class_inherits_from_params_class-check
24 changes: 6 additions & 18 deletions .travis.yml
@@ -1,24 +1,12 @@
---
language: ruby
bundler_args: --without development
before_install: rm Gemfile.lock || true
# This file is managed centrally by modulesync
# https://github.com/katello/foreman-installer-modulesync
rvm:
- 1.8.7
- 1.9.3
- 2.0.0
- 2.1.0
script: bundle exec rake test
- 2.1.5
env:
- PUPPET_VERSION="~> 3.2.0"
- PUPPET_VERSION="~> 3.3.0"
- PUPPET_VERSION="~> 3.4.0"
- PUPPET_VERSION="~> 3.5.0"
- PUPPET_VERSION="~> 3.6.0"
matrix:
exclude:
- rvm: 2.1.0
env: PUPPET_VERSION="~> 3.2.0"
- rvm: 2.1.0
env: PUPPET_VERSION="~> 3.3.0"
- rvm: 2.1.0
env: PUPPET_VERSION="~> 3.4.0"
- PUPPET_VERSION=3.5
bundler_args: --without development
sudo: false
269 changes: 215 additions & 54 deletions CONTRIBUTING.md
@@ -1,87 +1,248 @@
This module has grown over time based on a range of contributions from
people using it. If you follow these contributing guidelines your patch
will likely make it into a release a little quicker.
Checklist (and a short version for the impatient)
=================================================

* Commits:

## Contributing
- Make commits of logical units.

1. Fork the repo.
- Check for unnecessary whitespace with "git diff --check" before
committing.

2. Run the tests. We only take pull requests with passing tests, and
it's great to know that you have a clean slate
- Commit using Unix line endings (check the settings around "crlf" in
git-config(1)).

3. Add a test for your change. Only refactoring and documentation
changes require no new tests. If you are adding functionality
or fixing a bug, please add a test.
- Do not check in commented out code or unneeded files.

4. Make the test pass.
- The first line of the commit message should be a short
description (50 characters is the soft limit, excluding ticket
number(s)), and should skip the full stop.

5. Open an issue here - http://projects.theforeman.org/projects/katello/issues/new
- If you have a [http://projects.theforeman.org/](Redmine issue)
number, associate the issue in the message. The first line should start
with the issue number in the form "fixes #XXXX - rest of message".
[More information on the Redmine style](http://projects.theforeman.org/projects/foreman/wiki/Reviewing_patches-commit_message_format).
Tickets are not required for our installer Puppet modules.

6. Ensure commit message begins with 'Fixes #<redmine_issue_number>'
- If you have a GitHub issue number, associate the issue in the message.
End the commit message with "Fixes GH-1234" on a new line.

5. Push to your fork andaa submit a pull request.
- The body should provide a meaningful commit message, which:

- uses the imperative, present tense: "change", not "changed" or
"changes".

## Dependencies
- includes motivation for the change, and contrasts its
implementation with the previous behavior.

The testing and development tools have a bunch of dependencies,
all managed by [bundler](http://bundler.io/) according to the
[Puppet support matrix](http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/platforms.html#ruby-versions).
- Make sure that you have tests for the bug you are fixing, or
feature you are adding.

By default the tests use a baseline version of Puppet.
- Make sure the test suites passes after your commit:
`bundle exec rake spec` More information on [testing](#Testing) below

If you have Ruby 2.x or want a specific version of Puppet,
you must set an environment variable such as:
- When introducing a large change, make sure it is properly
documented in the README.md

export PUPPET_VERSION="~> 3.2.0"
* Submission:

Install the dependencies like so...
* Pre-requisites:

bundle install
- Make sure you have a [GitHub account](https://github.com/join)

## Syntax and style
* Preferred method:

The test suite will run [Puppet Lint](http://puppet-lint.com/) and
[Puppet Syntax](https://github.com/gds-operations/puppet-syntax) to
check various syntax and style things. You can run these locally with:
- Fork the repository on GitHub.

bundle exec rake lint
bundle exec rake syntax
- Push your changes to a topic branch in your fork of the
repository, in a new branch.

## Running the unit tests
- Submit a pull request to the repository in the 'katello'
organization.

The unit test suite covers most of the code, as mentioned above please
add tests if you're adding new functionality. If you've not used
[rspec-puppet](http://rspec-puppet.com/) before then feel free to ask
about how best to test your new feature. Running the test suite is done
with:
The long version
================

bundle exec rake spec
1. Make separate commits for logically separate changes.

Note also you can run the syntax, style and unit tests in one go with:
Please break your commits down into logically consistent units
which include new or changed tests relevant to the rest of the
change. The goal of doing this is to make the diff easier to
read for whoever is reviewing your code. In general, the easier
your diff is to read, the more likely someone will be happy to
review it and get it into the code base.

bundle exec rake test
If you are going to refactor a piece of code, please do so as a
separate commit from your feature or bug fix changes.

## Integration tests
If you have many commits to fix one issue, use `git rebase` or
`git commit --amend` to combine them into a single commit.

The unit tests just check the code runs, not that it does exactly what
we want on a real machine. For that we're using
[beaker](https://github.com/puppetlabs/beaker).
We also really appreciate changes that include tests to make
sure the bug is not re-introduced, and that the feature is not
accidentally broken.

This fires up a new virtual machine (using vagrant) and runs a series of
simple tests against it after applying the module. You can run this
with:
Describe the technical detail of the change(s). If your
description starts to get too long, that is a good sign that you
probably need to split up your commit into more finely grained
pieces.

bundle exec rake acceptance
Commits which plainly describe the things which help
reviewers check the patch and future developers understand the
code are much more likely to be merged in with a minimum of
bike-shedding or requested changes. Ideally, the commit message
would include information, and be in a form suitable for
inclusion in the release notes for the version of Puppet that
includes them.

This will run the tests on an Ubuntu 12.04 virtual machine. You can also
run the integration tests against Centos 6.5 with.
Please also check that you are not introducing any trailing
whitespace or other "whitespace errors". You can do this by
running "git diff --check" on your changes before you commit.

RS_SET=centos-64-x64 bundle exec rake acceptances
2. Sending your patches

If you don't want to have to recreate the virtual machine every time you
can use `BEAKER_DESTROY=no` and `BEAKER_PROVISION=no`. On the first run you will
at least need `BEAKER_PROVISION` set to yes (the default). The Vagrantfile
for the created virtual machines will be in `.vagrant/beaker_vagrant_fies`.
To submit your changes via a GitHub pull request, we _highly_
recommend that you have them on a topic branch, instead of
directly on "master".
It makes things much easier to keep track of, especially if
you decide to work on another thing before your first change
is merged in.

GitHub has some pretty good
[general documentation](http://help.github.com/) on using
their site. They also have documentation on
[creating pull requests](http://help.github.com/send-pull-requests/).

In general, after pushing your topic branch up to your
repository on GitHub, you can switch to the branch in the
GitHub UI and click "Pull Request" towards the top of the page
in order to open a pull request.


3. Update the related GitHub issue.

If there is a GitHub issue associated with the change you
submitted, then you should update the ticket to include the
location of your branch, along with any other commentary you
may wish to make.

Testing
=======

Getting Started
---------------

Our puppet modules provide [`Gemfile`](./Gemfile)s which can tell a ruby
package manager such as [bundler](http://bundler.io/) what Ruby packages,
or Gems, are required to build, develop, and test this software.

Please make sure you have [bundler installed](http://bundler.io/#getting-started)
on your system, then use it to install all dependencies needed for this project,
by running

```shell
% bundle install
Fetching gem metadata from https://rubygems.org/........
Fetching gem metadata from https://rubygems.org/..
Using rake (10.1.0)
Using builder (3.2.2)
-- 8><-- many more --><8 --
Using rspec-system-puppet (2.2.0)
Using serverspec (0.6.3)
Using rspec-system-serverspec (1.0.0)
Using bundler (1.3.5)
Your bundle is complete!
Use `bundle show [gemname]` to see where a bundled gem is installed.
```

NOTE some systems may require you to run this command with sudo.

If you already have those gems installed, make sure they are up-to-date:

```shell
% bundle update
```

With all dependencies in place and up-to-date we can now run the tests:

```shell
% rake spec
```

This will execute all the [rspec tests](http://rspec-puppet.com/) tests
under [spec/defines](./spec/defines), [spec/classes](./spec/classes),
and so on. rspec tests may have the same kind of dependencies as the
module they are testing. While the module defines in its [Modulefile](./Modulefile),
rspec tests define them in [.fixtures.yml](./fixtures.yml).

Writing Tests
-------------

Our tests use [rspec-puppet](http://rspec-puppet.com/) to check that classes
and defined types work when compiled with Puppet itself. Ideally, we want to
test the smallest logical units possible (i.e. a single class, not the whole
module), which helps with speed and reduces work when changing other parts of
the module.

By writing tests we ensure that future versions of the module don't introduce
regressions, and that we find issues sooner (in this project) rather than later
(when used in a Foreman installation).

Each class has its own file within spec/classes/, ending with "_spec.rb" and
inside each test file is a section for each test scenario ("describe").

A typical rspec-puppet test for a new class parameter would perhaps start with
defining a set of parameters to pass into the class:

describe 'with colour parameter' do
let :params do
{:colour => 'red'}
end
end

The test then has to check for the presence or absence of certain Puppet
resources with or without certain properties and relationships. e.g. a test
for a service class would ensure the service resource is present, with the
right name and the right ensure/enable properties.

describe 'with colour parameter' do
let :params do
{:colour => 'red'}
end

it 'should configure colour' do
should contain_file('/etc/service.conf').with_content('colour: red')
end
end

More advanced topics:

* Use rspec-puppet-facts loops: some tests use a loop with "on_supported_os"
to test the class under every OS supported in metadata.json.
* Test presence of inter-resource require/notify relationships.


If you have commit access to the repository
===========================================

Even if you have commit access to the repository, you will still need to
go through the process above, and have someone else review and merge
in your changes. The rule is that all changes must be reviewed by a
developer on the project (that did not write the code) to ensure that
all changes go through a code review process.

Having someone other than the author of the topic branch recorded as
performing the merge is the record that they performed the code
review.


Additional Resources
====================

* [Support and contact details](http://theforeman.org/support.html)

* [General Foreman contribution details](http://theforeman.org/contribute.html)

* [General GitHub documentation](http://help.github.com/)

* [GitHub pull request documentation](http://help.github.com/send-pull-requests/)