You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As suggested by @mandrijauskas in PR #31, the size of the cover images are okay but there may be some room for improvement. Using srcset especially for mobile seems worth doing prior to launch.
From what I'm seeing in the lighthouse test it's at 54 performance which isn't too bad. The only thing that might improve it would be to use smaller image sizes with srcsets for those resolutions, as well as using more compressed formats (webp, jpeg xr, etc) but that's getting nitty gritty performance heavy.
One of the volume authors also asked that we try to show more of the portrait when in the horizontal desktop browser configuration, so looking at varying image sizes might help there as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As suggested by @mandrijauskas in PR #31, the size of the cover images are okay but there may be some room for improvement. Using
srcset
especially for mobile seems worth doing prior to launch.One of the volume authors also asked that we try to show more of the portrait when in the horizontal desktop browser configuration, so looking at varying image sizes might help there as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: