Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove Node 0.10 from Travis CI #60

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 17, 2016
Merged

Remove Node 0.10 from Travis CI #60

merged 1 commit into from Feb 17, 2016

Conversation

astorije
Copy link
Member

This is needed for #43 to pass the CI.

@astorije
Remove Node 0.10 from Travis CI
42a607d 
This is needed for #43 to pass the CI.
@xPaw
Copy link
Member

xPaw commented Feb 17, 2016

👍

We probably should also drop 0.12 later on.

@astorije
Copy link
Member Author

Yep, but not today :-)

@astorije astorije added Type: Feature Tickets that describe a desired feature or PRs that add them to the project. second review needed labels Feb 17, 2016
@astorije
Copy link
Member Author

@JocelynDelalande, ok with this?

@JocelynDelalande
Copy link
Contributor

👍 (as there is almost no other test than linting for now).

xPaw added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2016
@xPaw
Merge pull request #60 from thelounge/astorije/travis-no-0.10
fc4f98f 
Remove Node 0.10 from Travis CI
@xPaw xPaw merged commit fc4f98f into master Feb 17, 2016
@xPaw xPaw deleted the astorije/travis-no-0.10 branch February 17, 2016 18:35
@astorije astorije mentioned this pull request Feb 18, 2016
Closed
@astorije astorije assigned xPaw and unassigned xPaw Feb 25, 2016
@astorije astorije added this to the 1.1.0 milestone Apr 1, 2017
@xPaw xPaw removed their assignment Mar 12, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Type: Feature Tickets that describe a desired feature or PRs that add them to the project.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.1.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@astorije @xPaw @JocelynDelalande