ADL - N : Resume failures with IPC causing suspend failures in stress tests #6475
Comments
|
Note on kernel version:
|
|
The failures seem to be IPC timeouts with no reported DSP crash. In the first log (pipeline_ipc_fail.txt) the first error is timeout on TRIG_STOP for DMIC pipeline: The suspend is done with error on CTX_SAVE (as DSP in unresponsive), and there are further errors on next resume. In the other log (kernel_log_20221017.txt), SOF dynamic debug log are not enabled, so there is less to see, but the first error is reported on resume. So this looks a bit different. So far nothing wrong spotted in the kernel side logs (e.g. an invalid sequence). |
|
Only similar bug (searched open and clossed, kernel + fw) is this one: #6185 .. but this happens with playback (so different direction) and a different use-case (multiple-pipeline-playback). Given the kernel side flow looks ok, moving to firmware side. |
|
@sathyap-chrome do you have the FW log ? I would say we are broken at the resume time if we cant hookup a route to DMIC. |
|
@mwasko fyi - pls assign. |
|
@lgirdwood We dont have a clear reproduction scenario. FW trace wont help with suspend resume right ? ( since FW trace starts after DSP starts) - but will try how we can get it. |
Sorry, I mean we need the log from part 1 - the resume that fails. This may shed some light on the previous suspend (where we may not have shutdown cleanly). |
|
@sathyap-chrome Would be good to have more samples of failing case logs. It would be curious to see if the problem is always:
The HW power-cycling should of course help, but we've had cases in the past where e.g. the DMA hw has had issues that cannot be recovered by the above flow. The rootcause would then be the TRIG_STOP on DMIC. |
|
I was now able to reproduce once locally on a "Nereid" device. FYI @abonislawski as you have the same hw. No FW logs yet, but below are kernel logs showing the IPC sequence of a working and non-working case. Reproduction is once per day for me now, so will spend some time looking at the logs and then planning what to try next. But FYI with others who have same hw, it is possible to trigger this bug with this setup. The sequence of IPC messages kernel sends seems valid. Here the failure is not with DMIC, but rather the first IPC sent to tear down the DSP pipelines for suspend (COMP_FREE for SSP1.IN). E.g. this line pair (not the timestamp showing 2sec, first line is last message to set up the DSP, second is start of suspend): FAIL case OK case: |
|
This is not a fix, but seems to have impact to reproduction rate -> thesofproject/linux#3965 |
|
I've been bisecting the issue on FW side (with unmodified SOF kernel, i.e. thesofproject/linux#3965 NOT applied). It seems newer FW releases handle this better and at least the reproduction rate is lower: I will continue the bisect work, but early results show the failures could be caused a by a bug that is already fixed in FW mainline. Bisecting is complicated as reproduction rate is low, so the results need to be verified multiple times. So take above data as early indication, to be verified by more testing. UPDATE, more test results: I've used a 150 iteration CrOS "suspend_stress_test" as my test case (taking a couple of hours). So the results so far show that error is seen with all pre-SOF-2.2 releases, but not seen at all with stable-v2.2 and newer. This matches with the bug report and the fact the issue is not reported/seen in upstream SOF CI. Only anomaly in the tests is the two failures seen with "rpl-001-drop-stable" branch. This is very close to stable-v2.2 with only a simple change to MCLK AlwaysON feature, that should not affect this test case. Furthermore, today's two 2 hour test runs with this rpl-001-drop-stable did not hit the error. This data does suggest thesofproject/linux#3965 should may be considered for upstream kernel. |
kv2019i
added a commit
to kv2019i/linux
that referenced
this issue
Oct 28, 2022
Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepare to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). Many product configurations have moved to dynamic pipelines (specified in SOF topology files), and this is a signal that also the component free paths must be verified in firmware. To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older FW versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, so add a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
|
Based on test results done with various older SOF firmware releases, I've pushed a polished kernel-side patch for upstream consideration: thesofproject/linux#3965 |
kv2019i
added a commit
to kv2019i/linux
that referenced
this issue
Oct 28, 2022
Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepare to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). Many product configurations have moved to dynamic pipelines (specified in SOF topology files), and this is a signal that also the component free paths must be verified in firmware. To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older FW versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, so add a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
kv2019i
added a commit
to kv2019i/linux
that referenced
this issue
Oct 28, 2022
Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, so add a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
kv2019i
added a commit
to kv2019i/linux
that referenced
this issue
Oct 28, 2022
Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, so add a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
|
Did a test today with CONFIG_DEBUG_BLOCK_FREE=y and did not find any invalid frees on heap with the FW version in original bug report. |
kv2019i
added a commit
to kv2019i/linux
that referenced
this issue
Oct 31, 2022
…and older Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, so add a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
kv2019i
added a commit
to kv2019i/linux
that referenced
this issue
Oct 31, 2022
…and older Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, so add a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
kv2019i
added a commit
to kv2019i/linux
that referenced
this issue
Oct 31, 2022
…and older Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
kv2019i
added a commit
to thesofproject/linux
that referenced
this issue
Nov 1, 2022
…and older Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this issue
Nov 1, 2022
…and older Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
|
Based on test data, this issue is fixed in SOF mainline. Due to low repro rate, bisecting to a specific fix was not possible. There have been multiple fixes to dangling pointers in SOF mainline and in general more testing this year as dynamic pipelines has been enabled in more and more topologies used in regular daily/PR CI. Closing this issue as already fixed. |
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Dec 1, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Dec 1, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Dec 1, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Dec 1, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Dec 1, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Dec 1, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Dec 1, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Dec 1, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Dec 2, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Dec 2, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Dec 2, 2022
…and older [ Upstream commit 003b786 ] Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
zhijianli88
pushed a commit
to zhijianli88/linux
that referenced
this issue
Dec 6, 2022
…and older Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
sboyanex
pushed a commit
to dineshXadireddi/Backport-series
that referenced
this issue
Dec 12, 2022
…n flow with SOF2.1 and older Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit 003b786b678919e072c2b12ffa73901ef840963e https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next) Conflicts: Upstream file is renamed. Hence BACKPORT BUG=b:218766331 TEST=Test sound cards are listed and audio playback works. Signed-off-by: Vamshi Krishna Gopal <vamshi.krishna.gopal@intel.com> Change-Id: I7b475367a087c9d2419bb0d8fd07856c19f74b93
dineshXadireddi
pushed a commit
to dineshXadireddi/Backport-series
that referenced
this issue
Dec 27, 2022
…th SOF2.1 and older Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit 003b786b678919e072c2b12ffa73901ef840963e https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next) Conflicts: Upstream file is renamed. Hence BACKPORT BUG=b:218766331 TEST=Test sound cards are listed and audio playback works. Signed-off-by: Vamshi Krishna Gopal <vamshi.krishna.gopal@intel.com> Change-Id: I7b475367a087c9d2419bb0d8fd07856c19f74b93
rutumberx
pushed a commit
to dineshXadireddi/Backport-series
that referenced
this issue
Jan 5, 2023
…n flow with SOF2.1 and older Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit 003b786b678919e072c2b12ffa73901ef840963e https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next) Conflicts: Upstream file is renamed. Hence BACKPORT BUG=b:218766331 TEST=Test sound cards are listed and audio playback works. Signed-off-by: Vamshi Krishna Gopal <vamshi.krishna.gopal@intel.com> Change-Id: I7b475367a087c9d2419bb0d8fd07856c19f74b93
Vamshigopal
pushed a commit
to Vamshigopal/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 9, 2023
…th SOF2.1 and older Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit 003b786 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next) Conflicts: Upstream file is renamed. Hence BACKPORT BUG=b:218766331 TEST=Test sound cards are listed and audio playback works. Signed-off-by: Vamshi Krishna Gopal <vamshi.krishna.gopal@intel.com> Change-Id: I7b475367a087c9d2419bb0d8fd07856c19f74b93
Vamshigopal
pushed a commit
to Vamshigopal/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2023
…th SOF2.1 and older Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit 003b786 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next) Conflicts: Upstream file is renamed. Hence BACKPORT BUG=b:218766331 TEST=Test sound cards are listed and audio playback works. Signed-off-by: Vamshi Krishna Gopal <vamshi.krishna.gopal@intel.com> Change-Id: I7b475367a087c9d2419bb0d8fd07856c19f74b93
rutumberx
pushed a commit
to dineshXadireddi/Backport-series
that referenced
this issue
Jan 19, 2023
…th SOF2.1 and older Originally in commit b2ebcf4 ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known limitations in older firmware versions. Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0 and SOF2.1 based firmware. The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older SOF kernels). To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines. The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions. Link: thesofproject/sof#6475 Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit 003b786b678919e072c2b12ffa73901ef840963e https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next) Conflicts: Upstream file is renamed. Hence BACKPORT BUG=b:218766331 TEST=Test sound cards are listed and audio playback works. Signed-off-by: Vamshi Krishna Gopal <vamshi.krishna.gopal@intel.com> Change-Id: I7b475367a087c9d2419bb0d8fd07856c19f74b93
taskset
pushed a commit
to taskset/kernel-automotive-9
that referenced
this issue
Jan 30, 2023
…and older
Originally in commit b2ebcf42a48f ("ASoC: SOF: free widgets in
sof_tear_down_pipelines() for static pipelines"), freeing of pipeline
components at suspend was only done with recent FW as there were known
limitations in older firmware versions.
Tests show that if static pipelines are used, i.e. all pipelines are
setup whenever firmware is powered up, the reverse action of freeing all
components at power down, leads to firmware failures with also SOF2.0
and SOF2.1 based firmware.
The problems can be specific to certain topologies with e.g. components
not prepared to be freed at suspend (as this did not happen with older
SOF kernels).
To avoid hitting these problems when kernel is upgraded and used with an
older firmware, bump the firmware requirement to SOF2.2 or newer. If an
older firmware is used, and pipeline is a static one, do not free the
components at suspend. This ensures the suspend flow remains backwards
compatible with older firmware versions. This limitation does not apply
if the product configuration is updated to dynamic pipelines.
The limitation is not linked to firmware ABI, as the interface to free
pipeline components has been available already before ABI3.19. The
problem is in the implementation, so firmware version should be used to
decide whether it is safe to use the newer flow or not. This patch adds
a new SOF_FW_VER() macro to compare SOF firmware release versions.
Link: thesofproject/sof#6475
Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101114913.1292671-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Author: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue Nov 1 13:49:13 2022 +0200
Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela <jkysela@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 003b786b678919e072c2b12ffa73901ef840963e)
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2125540
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We have multiple reports of suspend failures due to audio driver failing to suspend. This is due to unsuccessful resume in previous cycle.
Sharing the 2 scenarios where the failure seems to be either same or similar.
Scenario thesofproject/linux#1: Seen in local testing when we tried to repro the thesofproject/linux#3915 with debug enabled and ran suspend stess test. Here we found ipc errors while the FW load itself resumed fine.
log slice :
pipeline_ipc_fail.txt
Scenario thesofproject/linux#2: Seen in ODM reporting with a dozing script ( variation of suspend_stress_test with additonal parameters)
suspend_stress_test --count 15 --suspend_max 30 --suspend_min 28 --wake_max 10 --wake_min 5 --suspend_time_margin_min -1 --suspend_time_margin_max 30 --fw_errors_fatal --premature_wake_fatal --late_wake_fatal --record_dmesg_dir /var/log/suspend
Logs :
kernel_log_20221017.txt
Errors seen in scenario thesofproject/linux#1
0000:00:1f.3: ipc tx error for 0x30030000 (msg/reply size: 16/12): -22
0000:00:1f.3: sof_ipc3_route_setup: route DMIC1.IN -> BUF11.0 failed
0000:00:1f.3: sof_ipc3_set_up_all_pipelines: route set up failed
0000:00:1f.3: Failed to restore pipeline after resume -22
0000:00:1f.3: PM: pci_pm_resume+0x0/0xef returned -22 after 114680 usecs
0000:00:1f.3: PM: failed to resume async: error -22
Errors seen in scenario thesofproject/linux#2
0000:00:1f.3: ipc tx error for 0x30130000 (msg/reply size: 12/12): -22
0000:00:1f.3: Failed to restore pipeline after resume -22
0000:00:1f.3: PM: pci_pm_resume+0x0/0xef returned -22 after 113515 usecs
0000:00:1f.3: PM: failed to resume async: error -22
0000:00:1f.3: PM: calling pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x1da @ 5476, parent: pci0000:00
0000:00:1f.3: ipc tx error for 0x30020000 (msg/reply size: 12/12): -19
0000:00:1f.3: failed to free widget DMIC1.IN
0000:00:1f.3: failed to tear down paused pipelines
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: