Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

linting: Enable all Ruff rulesets by default #2627

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 7, 2024

Conversation

jku
Copy link
Member

@jku jku commented May 7, 2024

The goal here is to have ruff enable new rulesets when new releases are made without us having to do anything: we can then decide if we disable or not.

  • Enable a couple more rulesets (ERA, INP, T20)
  • Add a few individual ignores to tests and examples
  • Default to enable all, disable the rulesets we don't want

The goal here is to have ruff enable new rulesets when new releases are
made without us having to o anything: we can then decide if we disable
or not.

* Enable a couple more rulesets (ERA, INP, T )
* Add a few individual ignores to tests and examples
* Default to enable all, disable the rulesets we don't want

Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jkukkonen@google.com>
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8985594567

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 97.588%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8983103589: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1462
Relevant Lines: 1487

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Member

@lukpueh lukpueh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice!

@lukpueh lukpueh merged commit 87e418c into theupdateframework:develop May 7, 2024
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants