You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should we institutionally be referring to museum-created media and collection objects as something other than content? We should be more specific in describing our subject matter...i.e. artwork, scholarship, multimedia, metadata, design elements, user interfaces, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In your case, i think 'artworks and their stories' might be a good alternative. "Smooshing" it all together into a catch-all term doesn't do any of them justice, and when other industries use the term 'content' it means something interchangeable and of short-term value. I don't think museums want to get caught up in that.
Should we institutionally be referring to museum-created media and collection objects as something other than content? We should be more specific in describing our subject matter...i.e. artwork, scholarship, multimedia, metadata, design elements, user interfaces, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: