You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Clarify that organizers should announce cutoff ranking or cutoff time (see 9p2) before the round starts. This criterion shouldn't change (similar to A1a3+). A good reason to change the criterion is that according to the current one more than 75% competitors pass to the next round; in this case organizers should let 75% pass.
Changing the condition or announcing it after the current round ends could be interpreted as organizers/delegates favor themselves or their friends, which may or may not be true.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You provided a good reason to change the number, but there is another one: if you are running late, keeping the numbers may imply having to eliminate rounds/events. I would prefer having smaller finals for all events over having big finals for some and no finals for others.
Clarify that organizers should announce cutoff ranking or cutoff time (see 9p2) before the round starts. This criterion shouldn't change (similar to A1a3+). A good reason to change the criterion is that according to the current one more than 75% competitors pass to the next round; in this case organizers should let 75% pass.
Changing the condition or announcing it after the current round ends could be interpreted as organizers/delegates favor themselves or their friends, which may or may not be true.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: