Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Altering Clock Regulations #1076

Merged
merged 16 commits into from Dec 25, 2022
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions wca-guidelines.md
Expand Up @@ -73,8 +73,6 @@ To be more informative, each Guideline is classified using one of the following
- 3h2++) [CLARIFICATION] "Stickerless" puzzles that significantly differ from most mass-produced "stickerless" puzzles are only permitted at the discretion of the WCA Delegate.
- 3h2a+) [ADDITION] Examples of transparent parts that do not reveal more information about the state of the puzzle: internal parts of the puzzle mechanism, transparent Clock cases.
- 3j+) [REMINDER] In the past, engraved/embossed parts have been permitted. This is no longer permitted.
- 3j++) [CLARIFICATION] On Clock, pins may be distinguishable from any other pin of the same side.
- 3j1+) [REMINDER] On Clock, loose pins (i.e. pins that can toggle or recede using gravity instead of being directly pressed) are not considered reasonable wear.
- 3j2+) [CLARIFICATION] On Clock, the nine inner clock faces on one side are considered similar pieces.
Rouxles marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
- 3k2+) [ADDITION] The WCA Delegate should not apply a listed exception if they believe the competitor tried to use a non-permitted puzzle on purpose.
- 3k2b+) [CLARIFICATION] If a non-permitted puzzle is found during the course of a 3x3x3 Multi-Blind attempt, the puzzle must not be exchanged or removed from the attempt and must be counted as unsolved if the entire attempt is not disqualified.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -207,6 +205,11 @@ To be more informative, each Guideline is classified using one of the following
- E3d+) [CLARIFICATION] Any stopwatch or watch used by a competitor must not have any functions that would help the competitor find a solution.
- E3d++) [CLARIFICATION] Competitors should not consider a personal stopwatch or watch as the official time, and must submit their solution when the judge calls "STOP".

## <article-F><clock><clocksolving> Article F: Clock Solving
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i don't think any of these lines are needed because #1070


- F1a1+) [CLARIFICATION] Video or photographic evidence may be used to support this claim.
- F1a1++) [ADDITION] If the WCA Delegate does not have time to investigate this claim during the competition, they should grant the competitor a provisional extra.
Rouxles marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
- F1a1+++) [CLARIFICATION] If the puzzle falls during uncovering, such that all of its pins are affected, the WCA Delegate must provide an extra attempt.
Rouxles marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

## <article-H><multiple-blindfolded><multipleblindfoldedsolving> Article H: Multi-Blind Solving

Expand Down
7 changes: 6 additions & 1 deletion wca-regulations.md
Expand Up @@ -131,7 +131,11 @@ Note: Because Article and Regulation numbers are not reassigned when Regulations
- 3h2) Puzzles whose colored plastic is visible inside the puzzle (e.g. "stickerless" puzzles) are permitted. This does not include the following puzzles:
- 3h2a) Puzzles with transparent parts that can reveal more information about the state of the puzzle. Exception: An overlay sticker or a logo (see [Regulation 3l](regulations:regulation:3l)).
- 3h3) Any modifications to a puzzle that result in poor performance by a competitor are not grounds for additional attempts.
- 3h4) For Clock, custom "inserts" (the same shape and size as the traditional paper inserts) are permitted, at the discretion of the WCA Delegate. The inserts must have a clear indication of 12 o'clock that matches the original inserts.
- 3h4) For Clock, the following modifications are permitted:
- 3h4a) Customs "inserts" (the same shape and size as the traditional paper inserts) are permitted, at the discretion of the WCA Delegate. The inserts must have a clear indication of 12 o'clock that matches the original inserts.
Rouxles marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
- 3h4b) Puzzle design customizations that do not give an unfair advantage may be permitted, at the discretion of the WCA Delegate (e.g. checkerboard pattern clocks, faces with a custom design).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are modifications that give advantages similar to these in nature. What comes to mind is putting tape on the sides of the puzzle to hold it together + make the clock stand up straight instead of tilting, similar to how the Angstrom will stand up straight due to straight edges. Would this regulation disallow these being used?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wouldn't consider that unfair advantage, but I recognize it can be ambiguous

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe a clarification telling that this is not prohibited would be fine, do you agree?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

another example would be a top row of dials having a different plastic color than the other dials. There are a few different ways that similar things can be done so I believe that wording the guideline in a way that states that any modifications allowing competitors to more easily recognize puzzle orientation should not be considered an unfair advantage, a second guideline giving an specific example like the tape example that Jacob gave or the dial example that I gave could also be a helpful addition.

Rouxles marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
- 3h4c) Customizations in which pins may be distinguishable from any other pin of the same side are permitted under the discretion of the WCA Delegate.
Rouxles marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
- 3h4d) Customizations that leave the pins loose (i.e. pins that can toggle or recede using gravity instead of being directly pressed are not considered reasonable wear, and these puzzles must not be permitted)
Rouxles marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Rouxles marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
- 3j) Puzzles must be clean, and must not have any markings, elevated pieces, damage, or other differences that significantly distinguish any piece from a similar piece. Exception: a logo (see [Regulation 3l](regulations:regulation:3l)).
- 3j1) Puzzles are permitted to have reasonable wear, at the discretion of the WCA Delegate.
- 3j2) Definition: Two pieces are similar to each other if they are identical in shape and size, or mirrored in shape and identical in size.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -515,6 +519,7 @@ Note: Because Article and Regulation numbers are not reassigned when Regulations
- F2) The judge places the scrambled puzzle onto the mat in a standing position.
- F2a) The organization team may enforce using a stand for the puzzle to prevent it from falling before the start of the attempt. If such stands are used, the organization team should make an announcement before the round starts.
- F2a1) The judge must remove the stand from the mat immediately after the competitor removes the puzzle from it.
- F2b) If, during the transportation phase or while placing the puzzle cover on the table, one or more of the pins have their state affected, the competitor may proceed with the attempt and, after finishing the solve, alongside with the judge, explain the situation to the WCA Delegate. If the WCA Delegate beleives that the competitor did not gain an unfair advantage, they may allow the result to stand under their discretion.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would be beneficial for Delegates and competitors to see the Clarification F1a1+++ in this regulation (That an extra should be given if the competitor sees the puzzle). The way the regulation is currently worded, it may cause some confusion and judges / competitors may allow the attempt to continue and proceed even if the competitor saw the physical puzzle.

It would also be beneficial to define the case where the puzzle falls over during inspection (ie after the cover is lifted) as some may try to apply this regulation to that case, which would not be correct.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This last sentence of this regulation seems to vary a bit from other regulations that involve delegate discretion. Perhaps something like the following would fit better?

‘The result may stand if the competitor did not gain an unfair advantage, at the discretion of the WCA Delegate.’

Rouxles marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
- F3) At the end of the inspection period, the competitor places the puzzle in a standing position. Penalty: disqualification of the attempt (DNF).
- F3a) The competitor must not change the positions of any pins from their scrambled positions before the start of the solve. Penalty: disqualification of the attempt (DNF).

Expand Down