Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use "puppeteer-core" instead of "puppeteer" #41

Closed
j opened this issue Oct 29, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Use "puppeteer-core" instead of "puppeteer" #41

j opened this issue Oct 29, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@j
Copy link

j commented Oct 29, 2018

Is it possible to use "puppeteer-core" instead of "puppeteer" for the sake of not having to specify the environment variable to exclude a chrome download? I have to manually remove the chrome package from my distribution.

@thomasdondorf thomasdondorf added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 30, 2018
@thomasdondorf
Copy link
Owner

Currently, that is not possible, but I will add it in one of the next versions.

@chay22
Copy link

chay22 commented Nov 1, 2018

I don't know if this is related, but could you also please put into consideration to also allow another "puppeteer" package such as https://github.com/berstend/puppeteer-extra ?

@thomasdondorf
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for the idea. I will most likely add an option to pass a custom object which will be used as "puppeteer" object. So this will work then.

@thomasdondorf
Copy link
Owner

This is implemented in version 0.12. You can pass a custom object to be used like shown in this example. Give it a try :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants