New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Factory.build + association should not hit the db? #66
Comments
I've overridden this behavior in my app to do exactly that, but a few times I've run into problems where when I finally save the record and Rails goes to auto-save the associations, id's are lost. So it is possible, but it's buggy, at least from my perspective. |
Also see #64 |
If I'm open to ideas of how to make this work, but currently I'd rather err on the side of building a valid instance and saving some extra records. |
I'm going to close this issue, since it's a duplicate of #64. |
Closes #1236 Background: In issues #64 and #66 (from 2010) people expressed surprise that using the `build` strategy would still `create` any associations. I remember being similarly surprised by that behavior when I first started using factory_bot. The main reason for this behavior is to ensure the built instance will be valid if there were any foreign key validations (like `validates_presence_of :user_id`). If we don't save the associations, there won't be any ids present. PR #191 (from 2011) offers a workaround for people who don't want records to be saved automatically. Passing `strategy: :build` (originally `method: :build`, but later renamed) when declaring the association will prevent it from being saved when using `build`. But #191 isn't really a complete solution (as discussed on the PR after it was merged). `strategy: :build` may do the right thing when building objects with the `build` strategy, but it can cause new problems when using the `create` strategy. A better solution would be something like: `strategy: <whatever strategy I was already using>`. PRs #749 and #961 (merged in 2016) introduce something like that, with the `use_parent_strategy` configuration option. With this turned on `build` end up being generally [a little faster][] than `build_stubbed`, since it no longer needs to hit the database for each association. [a little faster]: https://gist.github.com/composerinteralia/d4796df9140f431e36f88dfb6fe9733a I have set `use_parent_strategy` on several projects now. I also added it to suspenders in thoughtbot/suspenders#952. On newer projects I have not run into any problems. On existing projects I have seen the occasional test failure, which are easy enough to fix by changing `build` to `create`. Unfortunately I don't think `use_parent_strategy` is widely known, since it wasn't documented until #1234 (about a month ago). I also learned in #1234 that the `use_parent_strategy` setting gets wiped out with `FactoryBot.reload`, which can be problematic when using factory_bot_rails. To summarize, we have been exploring having a `build` strategy that uses `build` all the way down since 2010, but there still isn't a totally reliable way to get that. This PR: * Default to using the parent strategy for factory_bot 5, as suggested in [this comment][] * Get rid of the `use_parent_strategy` option, since it doesn't play well with `FactoryBot.reload` [this comment]: #749 (comment) I think this PR will also make the `strategy` option unnecessary, but I would want to explore deprecating that in a separate PR. If dealing with foreign key validations is important, maybe we can rethink that from the ground up.
Background --- In issues #64 and #66 (from 2010) people expressed surprise that using the `build` strategy would still `create` any associations. I remember being similarly surprised by that behavior when I first started using factory_bot. The main reason for this behavior is to ensure the built instance will be valid if there were any foreign key validations (like `validates_presence_of :user_id`). If we don't save the associations, there won't be any ids present. PR #191 (from 2011) offers a workaround for people who don't want records to be saved automatically. Passing `strategy: :build` (originally `method: :build`, but later renamed) when declaring the association will prevent it from being saved when using `build`. But #191 isn't really a complete solution (as discussed on the PR after it was merged). `strategy: :build` may do the right thing when building objects with the `build` strategy, but it can cause new problems when using the `create` strategy. A better solution would be something like: `strategy: <whatever strategy I was already using>`. PRs #749 and #961 (merged in 2016) introduce something like that, with the `use_parent_strategy` configuration option. With this turned on `build` end up being generally [a little faster][] than `build_stubbed`, since it no longer needs to hit the database for each association. [a little faster]: https://gist.github.com/composerinteralia/d4796df9140f431e36f88dfb6fe9733a I have set `use_parent_strategy` on several projects now. I also added it to suspenders in thoughtbot/suspenders#952. On newer projects I have not run into any problems. On existing projects I have seen the occasional test failure, which are easy enough to fix by changing `build` to `create`. Unfortunately I don't think `use_parent_strategy` is widely known, since it wasn't documented until #1234 (about a month ago). I also learned in #1234 that the `use_parent_strategy` setting gets wiped out with `FactoryBot.reload`, which can be problematic when using factory_bot_rails. To summarize, we have been exploring having a `build` strategy that uses `build` all the way down since 2010, but there still isn't a totally reliable way to get that. This PR --- * Default to using the parent strategy for factory_bot 5, as suggested in #749. * In the original PR for this (#1240) I had removed `use_parent_strategy`, but to make the transition smoother I ended up fixing the reload problem in #1244 Once factory\_bot 5 is released and the dust has settled, it may make sense to deprecate `use_parent_strategy`, and maybe also the strategy option for associations.
Ordinarily when using Factory.build one does not expect FG will hit the db? Should FG possibly create and populate the associated records when Factory.build is used on a factory (as opposed to Factor.create) that has associations, but not create the records? Would this be possible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: