Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 13, 2023. It is now read-only.

Add Rackspace/Mosso Cloud Files support #17

Closed
qrush opened this issue Jun 5, 2009 · 24 comments
Closed

Add Rackspace/Mosso Cloud Files support #17

qrush opened this issue Jun 5, 2009 · 24 comments

Comments

@qrush
Copy link
Contributor

qrush commented Jun 5, 2009

Reported by minter

I've added support for Rackspace/Mosso Cloud Files, an S3 competitor, in my github fork (http://github.com/minter/paperclip/tree/master). I've included tests, based off of the existing S3 tests.

The Cloud Files support requires the Cloud Files Ruby gem, currently available at http://www.mosso.com/cloudfiles.jsp but hopefully soon in a more standard location.

I'm hoping this will be a useful addition to Paperclip, giving users another option for hosting their data in a cloud environment.

@minter
Copy link

minter commented Jun 8, 2009

The Cloud Files gem is now available on github's gem server, which is much easier.

@minter
Copy link

minter commented Aug 11, 2009

Just checking to see if there's any interest in merging this functionality in.

@peterberkenbosch
Copy link

+1 since I probably go with mosso...

@phillc
Copy link

phillc commented Sep 10, 2009

Just installed it as a plugin on my app, works perfectly.

@phillc
Copy link

phillc commented Oct 15, 2009

Would it satisfy the thoughtbot creators to maybe refactor the storage part of paperclip, so that we can create plugins for paperclip that implement other storage facilities?

@minter
Copy link

minter commented Oct 15, 2009

Seems reasonable, though you'd probably need to take that up with them.

@secretfader
Copy link

+1 for Cloud Files integration. Until then, I'll be using Minter's fork.

@mediaslave
Copy link

+1 for Cloud Files integration

3 similar comments
@pjleonhardt
Copy link

+1 for Cloud Files integration

@mrrooijen
Copy link

+1 for Cloud Files integration

@lancecarlson
Copy link

+1 for Cloud Files integration

@secretfader
Copy link

There's a fork with cloudfiles integration here: http://github.com/minter/paperclip

@lancecarlson
Copy link

it's not up to date with the latest commits.

@lancecarlson
Copy link

Yes, I'm using rails3, so I'm referring to the rails3 branch

@minter
Copy link

minter commented May 27, 2010

I'll see what I can do about that. I just merged in the latest commits from the master branch, though.

@arta
Copy link

arta commented Aug 10, 2010

+1 for Cloud Files integration

@mrrooijen
Copy link

It's been a year since this issue has been opened and the fork has been ready since then. Are there any plans of merging this into master any time soon, or at all?

I am aware that there is a fork that supports cloud files but it's getting out of date, it has Rails 3 deprecation warnings and the folder/file structure of the repository is now different. It's basically the repository (afaik) that he cloned from Paperclip's Rails 3 branch and implemented his Rackspace Cloud Files storage module.

@minter
Copy link

minter commented Mar 20, 2011

For what it's worth, my fork should be up to date with Rails 3 and the latest Thoughtbot master.

https://github.com/minter/paperclip (and https://rubygems.org/gems/paperclip-cloudfiles)

@cpytel
Copy link
Member

cpytel commented Jun 15, 2011

Hey everyone, I apologize for the delay on this. Everyone, but specifically @minter, with the Fog support in Paperclip, which supports Rackspace cloud files, is there any reason for this fork anymore? Thanks.

@minter
Copy link

minter commented Jun 15, 2011

There may not be a need any more - when I checked a few weeks ago, the Fog support was pretty new, and a few features that at least I use weren't supported. But I'll check out the current state of the Fog processor and see how it is!

But yeah, once the Fog support works properly, I doubt seriously there will be a reason to have my paperclip-cloudfiles fork around.

@cpytel
Copy link
Member

cpytel commented Jun 15, 2011

Cool, that'd be great if you could take a look at that and let us know here if its needed. Thanks again.

@minter
Copy link

minter commented Jun 16, 2011

It doesn't look like the current Fog storage module allows setting Fog credentials in a file (like config/amazon_s3.yml does for the s3 provider). Is that correct?

And if so, should I make a patch to add that support?

@jyurek
Copy link

jyurek commented Jun 16, 2011

No, the fog support doesn't handle that, and there's no reason it couldn't. I would be happy to accept a patch for that.

@jyurek
Copy link

jyurek commented Jun 27, 2011

On further reflection, a patch for that should be in its own issue, so I'll close this one. Thanks.

@jyurek jyurek closed this as completed Jun 27, 2011
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests