Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release a new version. #22

Closed
pbrisbin opened this issue Jan 13, 2014 · 8 comments
Closed

Release a new version. #22

pbrisbin opened this issue Jan 13, 2014 · 8 comments

Comments

@pbrisbin
Copy link
Contributor

thoughtbot/dotfiles relies on the post-hook running to setup vundle. The bug preventing this is fixed but not released -- I'd like to release a new version before resorting to documenting the -k workaround in dotfiles' README.

@mike-burns
Copy link
Contributor

Agreed.

Looks like NEWS.md.inneeds to be updated.

There's a release make target. It builds a deb, tags the branch, and uploads the docs. It requires a Debian system currently, since building a deb requires debuild.

Updating the Homebrew package is still a manual process: update this file: https://github.com/thoughtbot/homebrew-rcm/blob/master/Formula/rcm.rb . It relies on a file being uploaded somewhere; the plan for the future is to move that file into the gh-pages branch and automatically generate it as part of the release target.

I'm going to cc @georgebrock here because he's done some great stuff with https://github.com/thoughtbot/gitsh .

@georgebrock
Copy link
Contributor

The gitsh release code is here: https://github.com/thoughtbot/gitsh/blob/master/Makefile.am#L17

It's similar to the rcm make release, except it doesn't support debian (yet) and it does automate more of the steps, including the Homebrew forumla update.

@mike-burns
Copy link
Contributor

(And gitsh doesn't have HTML docs.)

@mike-burns
Copy link
Contributor

I opened #26 to discuss fixing the release process.

@mike-burns
Copy link
Contributor

1.2.0 is released, but it seems that gh-pages hasn't finished building yet. I cannot try the Debian instructions until they do.

OS X installs fine.

Have not actually tried 1.2.0, from package, on any system yet.

@mike-burns
Copy link
Contributor

Debian installs fine and works. @pbrisbin does rcm Arch install fine and work?

@pbrisbin
Copy link
Contributor Author

pbrisbin commented Feb 4, 2014

I confirmed it does, but I wouldn't worry about testing Arch w.r.t. releases. The Arch PKGBUILD installs directly from git sources.

@mike-burns
Copy link
Contributor

1.2.0 is out, blogged about, tweeted about, and has had two bugs reported about. Done and done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants