Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore meta refresh in HTML mails #712

Closed
sqozz opened this issue Jul 16, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

Ignore meta refresh in HTML mails #712

sqozz opened this issue Jul 16, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@sqozz
Copy link

sqozz commented Jul 16, 2015

Hello all together.
Today i've tried https://emailprivacytester.com/ to test the privacy leaks of my mail programs. K-9 was also tested and it turns out, that if you open a mail with a html meta refresh in it, it opens the desired URL fully automaticly with the default browser.
I don't know if this is a desired behaviour but i think, it is a huge potential risk for every user.
Maybe you can bind the loading of meta-tags with the request if a user wants to load pictures?

Greetings, sqozz

@cketti
Copy link
Member

cketti commented Jul 16, 2015

This will be fixed in the next major stable version.

#529

@philipwhiuk
Copy link
Contributor

This still appears to break on master. Not sure why this was closed?

@cketti
Copy link
Member

cketti commented Mar 5, 2016

Works for me. Tested with master as of 833e1cc

@donid
Copy link

donid commented Jul 8, 2016

I have just installed K9 5.010 from play-store and tried emailprivacytester and it still opened the web-page - am I miss-understanding something here or should this issue still be open?

@hallexander
Copy link

They refer to this being fixed with "the next major stable version" which hasn't happened yet. I haven't found out when one is expected.

/Alexander

On July 8, 2016 3:46:56 PM GMT+02:00, donid notifications@github.com wrote:

I have just installed K9 5.010 from play-store and tried
emailprivacytester and it still opened the web-page - am I
miss-understanding something here or should this issue still be open?


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#712 (comment)

@donid
Copy link

donid commented Jul 8, 2016

Oh, since this issue is older than 12 months, I thought there must have been a major release. That's a pity - german c't magazine has criticized this behavior of K9 already in 2013 (Issue 25 Page 104 E-Mail client comparison) in addition to a man-in-the-middle vulnerability (I don't know, if that has been fixed). So, I guess I will have to find a different mail-client until a new major version is released.
Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants