Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add T.A.D.S. to Project Generators section #30

Closed
thomvaill opened this issue Nov 22, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #36
Closed

Add T.A.D.S. to Project Generators section #30

thomvaill opened this issue Nov 22, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #36

Comments

@thomvaill
Copy link
Contributor

thomvaill commented Nov 22, 2019

Hi!
I love your website: it is clear, the name is fun, it catches the attention, and most of all: it is precious learning material! It's good to see good practices promoted like that.

However, during my past experience with Docker Swarm as small team leader, I noticed:

  • There is a lack of good examples of well-organized Infrastructure as Code repositories
  • It is hard to make developers use Docker, especially in a complex microservices environment
  • It is quite impossible to make a dev able to reproduce production env

That's why I created the T.A.D.S. boilerplate project: https://github.com/Thomvaill/tads-boilerplate
It integrates Terraform, Ansible and Docker Swarm together to do full Infrastructure as Code.
It uses the same processes and configs to deploy locally and in production. It also lets developers test their Swarm cluster in a production-like environment with Vagrant (3 nodes).

In this project, of course, I promote Docker Swarm Rocks principles. For the moment there is only traefik which is implemented in the example, but Swarmprom and portainer will follow soon (thomvaill/tads-boilerplate#6).

I think this project could totally appear in your "Project Generators" section. What do you think?
Moreover, I would love to hear your feedback on my project!

Thanks!

@tiangolo
Copy link
Owner

Cool!

Would you like to create a PR with it?

@thomvaill
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure! #36

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants