✨ Add support for Poetry 1.2.0 and above (including 1.5.1), deprecate support for Python 3.6

[mbeacom]

The goal of this PR is to resolve issues documented in #27 and compatibility issues mentioned in #25.

This PR resolves:

• a bad method reference to module_name in poetry.utils.helpers@module_name which is now only available via poetry.core.utils.helpers@module_name
• invalid method exception encountered on set_version as it was recently removed and rewritten to handle hashing under poetry.core's ProjectPackage._set_version(version, pretty_version)

Additionally, this PR updates some dependencies to allow pytest to execute under Python 3.10.

Tests are passing with the provided changes.

Related to #27 and #25 (probably fixes them)

[zmievsa]

@tiangolo @Gl0deanR Any chance this gets merged soon? All the new versions of poetry are simply not supported without this patch.

[zmievsa]

Everything works and the changes are very simple. I hope this gets merged soon.

[zmievsa]

I think I understand why Tiangolo gave up on this project. importlib.metadata.version does this without any plugins required. Poetry uses it too.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 75.00% and project coverage change: -2.50 ⚠️

Comparison is base (69b60e0) 100.00% compared to head (6b2c72c) 97.50%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              main      #28      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   100.00%   97.50%   -2.50%     
===========================================
  Files            2        2              
  Lines          160      160              
===========================================
- Hits           160      156       -4     
- Misses           0        4       +4     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
poetry_version_plugin/plugin.py	93.44% <75.00%> (-6.56%)	⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[tiangolo]

Thanks a lot @mbeacom! 🚀

And thanks everyone for the comments here.

I updated a couple of extra packages to be able to run the tests locally and tweaked a couple of extra things.

I'm not sure why Codecov is reporting some lines as not reached despite the tests that check for that exact output are passing. But anyway, I plan on moving away from Codecov, so that's fine for now.