-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove diffSample optimisation #17
Remove diffSample optimisation #17
Conversation
The Travis error seems to be a red herring:
|
Probably goes without saying, but please do test these changes against statsd to make sure you get the expected behavior. |
Sounds like a plan. I'm not expert enough with statsd to judge whether or not this PR is solving our woes, but let me get back to you once we have done an internal run with the feature branch this PR was created from. cc @domenkozar |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Can you please add a note to the changelog?
@adinapoli-iohk let's do an upstream stack change to use your branch and we'll deploy that to staging to verify. |
@domenkozar Absolutely.
Sure thing, leave it with me. I will confirm this is working as intended with Domen and will update the changelog accordingly. Which version should I put into the changelog? |
0.2.2.0, I think: even though this change is backwards-compatible, it changes the behaviour, so it should be possible to guard against it with a |
I can confirm we see multiple consequent same-value pushes to statsd using this PR. |
@domenkozar Neat! I guess now it's my turn to update the changelog so that we can make the PR officially mergeable 😛 |
Merged, thanks! |
|
@23Skidoo @tibbe This PR removes the
diffSample
optimisation to allowstatsd
to pick us these "low-level" details for us, as client code shouldn't be bothered.See here for a better description and the rationale around this PR: #16