Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: calibration metrics #150

Open
UAB-BST-680 opened this issue Apr 22, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Feature request: calibration metrics #150

UAB-BST-680 opened this issue Apr 22, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
metric 📏 a new yardstick metric

Comments

@UAB-BST-680
Copy link

I really like yardstick's API for computing discrimination. Calibration is also an important metric for classification models. Is there any interest in developing some yardstick functions to compute a calibration statistic?

Frank Harrell's Unreliability index seems like a good candidate. The Unreliability index is a chi-square statistic with 2 degrees of freedom testing the hypothesis that calibration slope and intercept are ideal (i.e., the slope is 1, the intercept is 0).

@juliasilge juliasilge added the metric 📏 a new yardstick metric label May 17, 2020
@alexpghayes
Copy link

On a related note, I would like to request calibration curves, as in, for example, https://scikit-learn.org/stable/auto_examples/calibration/plot_compare_calibration.html#sphx-glr-auto-examples-calibration-plot-compare-calibration-py

@ayueme
Copy link

ayueme commented Jun 5, 2022

Really need that toooo! Hope calibration curve can be easily plotted with yardstick! Thank you very much.

@Guiquan-27
Copy link

Yes!! This is also I really want. Thanks!

@aminadibi
Copy link

Calibration curves are the go-to metric in clinical prediction models, arguably more important that ROC curves.
See
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-16399-0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
metric 📏 a new yardstick metric
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants