/
translation.Rmd
287 lines (200 loc) · 7.91 KB
/
translation.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
---
title: "Translation"
output: rmarkdown::html_vignette
vignette: >
%\VignetteIndexEntry{translation}
%\VignetteEngine{knitr::rmarkdown}
%\VignetteEncoding{UTF-8}
---
```{r, include = FALSE}
knitr::opts_chunk$set(
collapse = TRUE,
comment = "#>"
)
```
## Introduction
This vignette shows the details of how dtplyr translates dplyr expressions into the equivalent [data.table](http://r-datatable.com/) code. If you see places where you think I could generate better data.table code, please [let me know](https://github.com/tidyverse/dtplyr/issues)!
This document assumes that you're familiar with the basics of data.table; if you're not, I recommend starting at `vignette("datatable-intro.html")`.
```{r setup, message = FALSE}
library(dtplyr)
library(data.table)
library(dplyr)
```
## The basics
To get started, I'll create a simple lazy table with `lazy_dt()`:
```{r}
df <- data.frame(a = 1:5, b = 1:5, c = 1:5, d = 1:5)
dt <- lazy_dt(df)
```
The actual data doesn't matter here since we're just looking at the translation.
When you print a lazy frame, it tells you that it's a local data table with four rows. It also prints the call that dtplyr will evaluate when we execute the lazy table. In this case it's very simple:
```{r}
dt
```
If we just want to see the generated code, you can use `show_query()`. I'll use that a lot in this vignette.
```{r}
dt %>% show_query()
```
## Simple verbs
Many dplyr verbs have a straightforward translation to either the `i` or `j` component of `[.data.table`.
### `filter()` and `arrange()`
`filter()` and `arrange()` become elements of `i`:
```{r}
dt %>% arrange(a, b, c) %>% show_query()
dt %>% filter(b == c) %>% show_query()
dt %>% filter(b == c, c == d) %>% show_query()
```
### `select()`, `summarise()`, `transmute()`
`select()`, `summarise()` and `transmute()` all become elements of `j`:
```{r}
dt %>% select(a:b) %>% show_query()
dt %>% summarise(a = mean(a)) %>% show_query()
dt %>% transmute(a2 = a * 2) %>% show_query()
```
`mutate()` also uses the `j` component with data.table's special `:=` operator:
```{r}
dt %>% mutate(a2 = a * 2, b2 = b * 2) %>% show_query()
```
Note that dplyr will not copy the input data by default, see below for more details.
`mutate()` allows to refer to variables that you just created using an "extended `j`" expression:
```{r}
dt %>% mutate(a2 = a * 2, b2 = b * 2, a4 = a2 * 2) %>% show_query()
```
`transmute()` works similarly:
```{r}
dt %>% transmute(a2 = a * 2, b2 = b * 2, a4 = a2 * 2) %>% show_query()
```
## Other calls
Other verbs require calls to other functions:
### `rename()`
`rename()` uses `setnames()`:
```{r}
dt %>% rename(x = a, y = b) %>% show_query()
```
### `distinct()`
`distinct()` uses `unique()`:
```{r}
dt %>% distinct() %>% show_query()
dt %>% distinct(a, b) %>% show_query()
dt %>% distinct(a, b, .keep_all = TRUE) %>% show_query()
```
`distinct()` on a computed column uses an intermediate mutate:
```{r}
dt %>% distinct(c = a + b) %>% show_query()
dt %>% distinct(c = a + b, .keep_all = TRUE) %>% show_query()
```
### Joins
Most joins use the `[.data.table` equivalent:
```{r}
dt2 <- lazy_dt(data.frame(a = 1))
dt %>% inner_join(dt2, by = "a") %>% show_query()
dt %>% right_join(dt2, by = "a") %>% show_query()
dt %>% left_join(dt2, by = "a") %>% show_query()
dt %>% anti_join(dt2, by = "a") %>% show_query()
```
But `full_join()` uses `merge()`
```{r}
dt %>% full_join(dt2, by = "a") %>% show_query()
```
In some case extra calls to `data.table::setcolorder()` and `data.table::setnames()`
are required to ensure correct column order and names in:
```{r}
dt3 <- lazy_dt(data.frame(b = 1, a = 1))
dt %>% left_join(dt3, by = "a") %>% show_query()
dt %>% full_join(dt3, by = "b") %>% show_query()
```
Semi-joins are little more complex:
```{r}
dt %>% semi_join(dt2, by = "a") %>% show_query()
```
### Set operations
Set operations use the fast data.table alternatives:
```{r}
dt %>% intersect(dt2) %>% show_query()
dt %>% setdiff(dt2) %>% show_query()
dt %>% union(dt2) %>% show_query()
```
## Grouping
Just like in dplyr, `group_by()` doesn't do anything by itself, but instead modifies the operation of downstream verbs. This generally just involves using the `keyby` argument:
```{r}
dt %>% group_by(a) %>% summarise(b = mean(b)) %>% show_query()
```
You may use `by` instead of `keyby` if you set `arrange = FALSE`:
```{r}
dt %>% group_by(a, arrange = FALSE) %>% summarise(b = mean(b)) %>% show_query()
```
Often, there won't be too much of a difference between these, but for larger grouped operations, the overhead of reordering data may become significant. In these situations, using `arrange = FALSE` becomes preferable.
The primary exception is grouped `filter()`, which requires the use of `.SD`:
```{r}
dt %>% group_by(a) %>% filter(b < mean(b)) %>% show_query()
```
## Combinations
dtplyr tries to generate generate data.table code as close as possible to what you'd write by hand, as this tends to unlock data.table's tremendous speed. For example, if you `filter()` and then `select()`, dtplyr generates a single `[`:
```{r}
dt %>%
filter(a == 1) %>%
select(-a) %>%
show_query()
```
And similarly when combining filtering and summarising:
```{r}
dt %>%
group_by(a) %>%
filter(b < mean(b)) %>%
summarise(c = max(c)) %>%
show_query()
```
This is particularly nice when joining two tables together because you can select variables after you have joined and data.table will only carry those into the join:
```{r}
dt3 <- lazy_dt(data.frame(x = 1, y = 2))
dt4 <- lazy_dt(data.frame(x = 1, a = 2, b = 3, c = 4, d = 5, e = 7))
dt3 %>%
left_join(dt4) %>%
select(x, a:c) %>%
show_query()
```
Note, however, that `select()`ing and then `filter()`ing must generate two separate calls to `[`, because data.table evaluates `i` before `j`.
```{r}
dt %>%
select(X = a, Y = b) %>%
filter(X == 1) %>%
show_query()
```
Similarly, a `filter()` and `mutate()` can't be combined because `dt[a == 1, .(b2 := b * 2)]` would modify the selected rows in place:
```{r}
dt %>%
filter(a == 1) %>%
mutate(b2 = b * 2) %>%
show_query()
```
## Copies
By default dtplyr avoids mutating the input data, automatically creating a `copy()` if needed:
```{r}
dt %>% mutate(a2 = a * 2, b2 = b * 2) %>% show_query()
```
Note that dtplyr does its best to avoid needless copies, so it won't explicitly copy if there's already an implicit copy produced by `[`, `head()`, `merge()` or similar:
```{r}
dt %>%
filter(x == 1) %>%
mutate(a2 = a * 2, b2 = b * 2) %>%
show_query()
```
You can choose to opt out of this copy, and take advantage of data.table's reference semantics (see `vignette("datatable-reference-semantics")` for more details). Do this by setting `immutable = FALSE` on construction:
```{r}
dt2 <- data.table(a = 1:10)
dt_inplace <- lazy_dt(dt2, immutable = FALSE)
dt_inplace %>% mutate(a2 = a * 2, b2 = b * 2) %>% show_query()
```
## Performance
There are two components to the performance of dtplyr: how long it takes to generate the translation, and how well the translation performs. Given my explorations so far, I'm reasonably confident that we're generating high-quality data.table code, so most of the cost should be in the translation itself.
The following code briefly explores the performance of a few different translations. A significant amount of work is done by the dplyr verbs, so we benchmark the whole process.
```{r}
bench::mark(
filter = dt %>% filter(a == b, c == d),
mutate = dt %>% mutate(a = a * 2, a4 = a2 * 2, a8 = a4 * 2) %>% show_query(),
summarise = dt %>% group_by(a) %>% summarise(b = mean(b)) %>% show_query(),
check = FALSE
)[1:6]
```
These translations all take less than a millisecond, suggesting that the performance overhead of dtplyr should be negligible for realistic data sizes. Note that dtplyr run-time scales with the complexity of the pipeline, not the size of the data, so these timings should apply regardless of the size of the underlying data[^copy].
[^copy]: Unless a copy is performed.