feat: add support of filtering out objects by their orignal names or attributes

[ktro2828]

Category

• Perception

What

Related to #65
Add support of filtering out objects by their original label names or attributes.
Filter out by ...

• keywords of original label names: fire -> filter out vehicle.fire
• attributes: cycle_state.without_rider -> filter out labels with cycle_state.without_rider

config = PerceptionEvaluationConfig(
    evaluation_config_dict={
        ...
        ignore_attributes=["cycle_state.without_rider"],
        ...
    }
)

Type of change

• New feature
• Update test
• Update document

Test performed

• test.sensing_lsim

• test.perception_lsim

Reference

Notes for reviewer

[hayato-m126]

https://github.com/tier4/autoware_perception_evaluation/pull/66/files#diff-a87b266582b6dbe3c4d4a31bdcb93dcdd9e957669e9411733b343a9bf1660bfbR165

PerceptionPassFailConfigに、ignore_attributesって必要じゃないですか？

[hayato-m126]

A PR was created to use the functionality of this branch from driving_log_replayer.
tier4/driving_log_replayer#146

Verified that it works correctly with the created PR.

[ktro2828]

@hayato-m126

PerceptionPassFailConfigに、ignore_attributesって必要じゃないですか？

No, it does not. Objects are filtered out with paramters named CriticalObjectFilterConfig.filtering_params like this

autoware_perception_evaluation/perception_eval/perception_eval/evaluation/result/perception_pass_fail_result.py

Lines 78 to 83 in 9392d9e

	self.critical_ground_truth_objects = filter_objects(
	objects=ros_critical_ground_truth_objects,
	is_gt=True,
	ego2map=self.ego2map,
	**self.critical_object_filter_config.filtering_params,
	)

[ktro2828]

Isn't your suggestion syntax error?

[hayato-m126]

Sorry. The SUGGESTION I wrote was wrong.
I have confirmed that it works correctly with the code that is implemented now.

[hayato-m126]

LGTM