Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

rawclient: add batch scan keys #191

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2021
Merged

rawclient: add batch scan keys #191

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2021

Conversation

iosmanthus
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: iosmanthus myosmanthustree@gmail.com

What problem does this PR solve?

This pull request adds batchScanKeys for RawClient just like the API provided in Rust client:

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

Code changes

  • Has interface methods change

Side effects

  • Possible performance regression
  • Increased code complexity
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Related changes

  • Need to cherry-pick to the release branch
  • Need to update the documentation
  • Need to be included in the release note

@iosmanthus
add batch scan keys
11bac25 
Signed-off-by: iosmanthus <myosmanthustree@gmail.com>
marsishandsome
marsishandsome approved these changes Jun 9, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@marsishandsome marsishandsome left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@marsishandsome
Copy link
Collaborator

/run-all-tests

@iosmanthus
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@ti-srebot
Copy link
Collaborator

/run-all-tests

@ti-srebot ti-srebot merged commit 52f8c25 into tikv:master Jun 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@marsishandsome marsishandsome marsishandsome approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
status/can-merge status/LGT1
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@iosmanthus @marsishandsome @ti-srebot