kv: added RunInTransaction style transaction interface

[AmoebaProtozoa]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: Ref #5293

Current kv.Base interface lacks the ability to run batch commands in transactions.
In order to leverage transactions in etcd, one must get a hold of etcd.Client, bypassing the Storage and KV level abstractions.

This PR aims to solve this by providing basic transaction abilities at the storage level.

What is changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test

Release note

None.

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• disksing
• rleungx

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 75.45% // Head: 75.34% // Decreases project coverage by -0.11% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (bf1de5b) compared to base (275c43e).
Patch coverage: 57.14% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5347      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.45%   75.34%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files         338      338              
  Lines       33655    33774     +119     
==========================================
+ Hits        25396    25448      +52     
- Misses       6065     6126      +61     
- Partials     2194     2200       +6     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	75.34% <57.14%> (-0.12%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pkg/storage/kv/etcd_kv.go	68.25% <53.57%> (+1.11%)	⬆️
pkg/storage/kv/levedb_kv.go	72.91% <60.00%> (-14.04%)	⬇️
pkg/storage/kv/mem_kv.go	78.87% <60.52%> (-21.13%)	⬇️
pkg/errs/errs.go	75.00% <0.00%> (-25.00%)	⬇️
server/region_syncer/server.go	82.96% <0.00%> (-4.40%)	⬇️
server/storage/storage.go	67.30% <0.00%> (-3.85%)	⬇️
pkg/id/id.go	83.05% <0.00%> (-3.39%)	⬇️
server/schedulers/shuffle_hot_region.go	55.12% <0.00%> (-2.57%)	⬇️
pkg/storage/endpoint/meta.go	61.36% <0.00%> (-2.28%)	⬇️
pkg/encryption/key_manager.go	70.11% <0.00%> (-1.60%)	⬇️
... and 13 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[nolouch]

Hi, @AmoebaProtozoa , would you please resolve the conflicts, I think it's useful.

[disksing]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

@disksing: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: d60e299

[disksing]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

@disksing: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 5f7115e

[JmPotato]

/rebuild

[purelind]

/test build