build: bump alpine image to 3.17

[AmoebaProtozoa]

Signed-off-by: David 8039876+AmoebaProtozoa@users.noreply.github.com

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: Close #5968

What is changed and how does it work?

current runner image from docker file is based on alpine 3.5, which reached end of life more than 4 years ago (2018-11-01) and does not support arm build. This PR bumps it to a more recent 3.17, same as golang:1.19-alpine used in builder.

further more, binutils-gold is added to avoid errors like fatal error: cannot find 'ld', similar issues can be seen here: golang/go#52399

Check List

Tests

• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  make docker-image now finished successfully on m1 mac.
  

Release note

None

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• lhy1024
• nolouch

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[ti-chi-bot]

Hi @AmoebaProtozoa. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a tikv member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[nolouch]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

@nolouch: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 267e145

[lhy1024]

plz set issue level

[AmoebaProtozoa]

plz set issue level

I don't think I have the privilege to do that, can you add it?

[lhy1024]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

@lhy1024: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[lhy1024]

/run-all-tests

[lhy1024]

/run-check-issue-triage-complete

[lhy1024]

/run-all-tests

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 75.22% // Head: 75.12% // Decreases project coverage by -0.11% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (302aefb) compared to base (5a8f93d).
Patch coverage: 57.14% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 302aefb differs from pull request most recent head 6e751ce. Consider uploading reports for the commit 6e751ce to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5969      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.22%   75.12%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         362      362              
  Lines       36232    36304      +72     
==========================================
+ Hits        27255    27272      +17     
- Misses       6601     6654      +53     
- Partials     2376     2378       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	75.12% <57.14%> (-0.11%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
client/resource_manager/client/client.go	61.09% <39.53%> (-1.78%)	⬇️
client/resource_manager/client/model.go	63.49% <44.00%> (-16.06%)	⬇️
pkg/mcs/resource_manager/server/token_bukets.go	90.00% <63.63%> (-3.55%)	⬇️
client/resource_manager/client/limiter.go	63.75% <84.61%> (+6.99%)	⬆️
pkg/utils/etcdutil/etcdutil.go	83.49% <88.23%> (-1.39%)	⬇️
server/apiv2/handlers/keyspace.go	64.81% <100.00%> (ø)
server/server.go	73.97% <100.00%> (-0.91%)	⬇️
pkg/dashboard/keyvisual/input/core.go	0.00% <0.00%> (-33.34%)	⬇️
pkg/tso/local_allocator.go	71.62% <0.00%> (-4.06%)	⬇️
pkg/tso/allocator_manager.go	62.25% <0.00%> (-3.71%)	⬇️
... and 21 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[ti-chi-bot]

@AmoebaProtozoa: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[AmoebaProtozoa]

I think it needs a /test build or a ok-to-test label for ci to start running
@lhy1024

[lhy1024]

/ok-to-test