Refactor some common utilities which will be used by the upcoming TSO microservice change

[binshi-bing]

This change is split from "basic implement tso gPRC service #5949"

Signed-off-by: Bin Shi binshi.bing@gmail.com

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: Ref #5836

What is changed and how does it work?

This change is split from basic implement tso gPRC service #5949

    Refactor some common utilities which will be used by tso mcs

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test

Code changes

Side effects

None

Related changes

• PR to update pingcap/docs/pingcap/docs-cn:
• PR to update pingcap/tiup:
• Need to cherry-pick to the release branch

Release note

None

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• JmPotato
• lhy1024

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[ti-chi-bot]

Hi @binshi-bing. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a tikv member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 75.13% // Head: 75.11% // Decreases project coverage by -0.03% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (6944aa6) compared to base (e6086c4).
Patch coverage: 77.50% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5985      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.13%   75.11%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         362      362              
  Lines       36282    36280       -2     
==========================================
- Hits        27262    27250      -12     
- Misses       6645     6651       +6     
- Partials     2375     2379       +4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	75.11% <77.50%> (-0.03%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
server/server.go	74.87% <0.00%> (-0.90%)	⬇️
server/util.go	46.37% <ø> (-5.31%)	⬇️
pkg/utils/etcdutil/etcdutil.go	84.49% <69.23%> (-0.95%)	⬇️
pkg/utils/grpcutil/grpcutil.go	70.68% <100.00%> (+3.38%)	⬆️
server/grpc_service.go	49.07% <100.00%> (-0.09%)	⬇️
pkg/utils/metricutil/metricutil.go	82.75% <0.00%> (-10.35%)	⬇️
...erver/config/service_middleware_persist_options.go	91.66% <0.00%> (-8.34%)	⬇️
client/resource_group/controller/limiter.go	61.25% <0.00%> (-6.25%)	⬇️
pkg/member/member.go	60.00% <0.00%> (-4.22%)	⬇️
server/schedulers/random_merge.go	62.50% <0.00%> (-4.17%)	⬇️
... and 28 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[JmPotato]

The rest LGTM.

[lhy1024]

I approve for moving these two functions

[lhy1024]

/ok-to-test

[JmPotato]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

@JmPotato: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 6944aa6