resource_manager/client: Abstract the funcs of all group iterative exec.

[HuSharp]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: Ref #5851

What is changed and how does it work?

Abstract the funcs of all group iterative exec.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test

Release note

None.

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• JmPotato
• nolouch

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[ti-chi-bot]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 88.88% and project coverage change: -0.03 ⚠️

Comparison is base (3e6ac89) 75.13% compared to head (1a2f950) 75.10%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6303      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.13%   75.10%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         404      404              
  Lines       39686    39673      -13     
==========================================
- Hits        29819    29798      -21     
- Misses       7267     7268       +1     
- Partials     2600     2607       +7     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	75.10% <88.88%> (-0.03%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
client/resource_group/controller/controller.go	72.87% <88.88%> (-1.36%)	⬇️

... and 23 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[nolouch]

lgtm! good catch.

[HuSharp]

@CabinfeverB PTAL, thx!

[JmPotato]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

@JmPotato: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 1a2f950

[ti-chi-bot]

@HuSharp: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.