Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*: fix TestConfigTTL #8030

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Apr 7, 2024
Merged

*: fix TestConfigTTL #8030

merged 3 commits into from Apr 7, 2024

Conversation

rleungx
Copy link
Member

@rleungx rleungx commented Apr 7, 2024

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: Close #7712, close #7631

What is changed and how does it work?

assertTTLConfig is not right before.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

Release note

None.

Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <rleungx@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Apr 7, 2024

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • HuSharp
  • lhy1024

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot requested review from disksing and nolouch April 7, 2024 08:56
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 7, 2024
@rleungx rleungx requested review from lhy1024 and HuSharp and removed request for nolouch and disksing April 7, 2024 08:57
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Apr 7, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Apr 7, 2024
@lhy1024
Copy link
Contributor

lhy1024 commented Apr 7, 2024

/merge

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Apr 7, 2024

@lhy1024: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Apr 7, 2024

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: ecaebe8

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Apr 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Apr 7, 2024

@rleungx: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit ff3ac73 into tikv:master Apr 7, 2024
22 checks passed
@rleungx rleungx deleted the fix-test-2024-3 branch April 8, 2024 02:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TestConfigTTL is unstable TestConfigTTL is unstable
3 participants