Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*: make gc not write db directly #13982

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Dec 23, 2022

Conversation

BusyJay
Copy link
Member

@BusyJay BusyJay commented Dec 22, 2022

What is changed and how it works?

Issue Number: Ref #12842

What's Changed:

We rely on non-concurrent memtable write for dynamic regions to
achieve best performance. This PR makes sure writes of compaction
filter be redirected to apply thread when dynamic regions is enabled.

The solution may miss data if TiKV crashes before writes are flushed
to disk. Note even for v1, it's also possible to leave garbage if writes
to rocksdb fail. We need to scan default CFs and check for orphan
versions.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test

Release note

None

We rely on non-concurrent memtable write for dynamic regions to achieve
best performance. This PR makes sure writes of compaction filter be
redirected to apply thread when dynamic regions is enabled.

The solution may miss data if TiKV crashes before writes are flushed to
disk. Note even for v1, it's also possible to leave garbage if writes to
rocksdb fail. We need to scan default CFs and check for orphan versions.

Signed-off-by: Jay Lee <BusyJayLee@gmail.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Dec 22, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • tabokie
  • tonyxuqqi

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@@ -135,8 +136,6 @@ impl Drop for RawCompactionFilter {
fn drop(&mut self) {
self.raw_gc_mvcc_deletions();

self.engine.sync_wal().unwrap();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sync_wal is not needed in v2. But what about v1? I suppose src/server/gc_worker/rawkv_compaction_filter.rs is for v1 as well.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rawkv doesn't write to kv db directly, it was added by accident.

modifies = vec![];
}
}
if let Err(e) = self.engine.modify_on_kv_engine(region_modifies) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How to ensure when the apply runs the unsafe delete, it's still the same tablet. I think we need to add the tablet suffix in the region_modifies

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't. The deleted keys are the keys that's stale. Once they are stale, they will always be. So always delete them in the latest tablet is correct.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Status: PR - There is already 1 approval label Dec 23, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Status: PR - There are already 2 approvals and removed status/LGT1 Status: PR - There is already 1 approval labels Dec 23, 2022
@BusyJay
Copy link
Member Author

BusyJay commented Dec 23, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@BusyJay: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: b673f5a

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Status: Can merge to base branch label Dec 23, 2022
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@BusyJay: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit a422de9 into tikv:master Dec 23, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added this to the Pool milestone Dec 23, 2022
@BusyJay BusyJay deleted the compaction-filter-gc-v2 branch December 23, 2022 05:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none size/XL status/can-merge Status: Can merge to base branch status/LGT2 Status: PR - There are already 2 approvals
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants