Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Raftstore-v2: support split operator #14199

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Feb 14, 2023
Merged

Conversation

SpadeA-Tang
Copy link
Member

@SpadeA-Tang SpadeA-Tang commented Feb 10, 2023

Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang u6748471@anu.edu.au

What is changed and how it works?

Issue Number: Ref #12842

What's Changed:

Support split operator got from PD.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test

Release note

None

Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <u6748471@anu.edu.au>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Feb 10, 2023

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • tabokie
  • tonyxuqqi

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@SpadeA-Tang
Copy link
Member Author

/test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Status: PR - There is already 1 approval label Feb 10, 2023
@@ -305,6 +305,10 @@ impl<'a, EK: KvEngine, ER: RaftEngine, T: Transport> PeerFsmDelegate<'a, EK, ER,
.peer_mut()
.on_request_split(self.store_ctx, request, ch)
}
PeerMsg::RequestHalfSplit { request, ch } => self
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems it's used by test purpose only. It would be better to make it test only.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess it's not for test purpose. The request is lanuched by pd-ctl.

@@ -149,6 +149,15 @@ pub struct RequestSplit {
pub source: Cow<'static, str>,
}

#[derive(Debug)]
pub struct RequestHalfSplit {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If it's test only, it would be better to make it test only. Check other example for test-only structures (search testexport)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto

Copy link
Contributor

@tonyxuqqi tonyxuqqi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM overall. Some code can be compiled under "testexport"

@SpadeA-Tang
Copy link
Member Author

/test

Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <u6748471@anu.edu.au>
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <u6748471@anu.edu.au>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Status: PR - There are already 2 approvals and removed status/LGT1 Status: PR - There is already 1 approval labels Feb 14, 2023
@tabokie
Copy link
Member

tabokie commented Feb 14, 2023

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@tabokie: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 37a33fd

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Status: Can merge to base branch label Feb 14, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit c4b38e8 into tikv:master Feb 14, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added this to the Pool milestone Feb 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
contribution Type: PR - From contributors release-note-none size/L status/can-merge Status: Can merge to base branch status/LGT2 Status: PR - There are already 2 approvals
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants