Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should surround-operator-alist be evil-surround-operator-alist? #55

Closed
Drolyt opened this issue Jun 16, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Should surround-operator-alist be evil-surround-operator-alist? #55

Drolyt opened this issue Jun 16, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@Drolyt
Copy link
Contributor

Drolyt commented Jun 16, 2015

In the documentation it is suggested to fix the conflict with evil-paredit with the following snippet:

(add-to-list 'surround-operator-alist
             '(evil-paredit-change . change))
(add-to-list 'surround-operator-alist
             '(evil-paredit-delete . delete))

However, surround-operator-alist does not appear to be an actual variable. Is this supposed to be evil-surround-operator-alist?

@expez
Copy link

expez commented Jun 16, 2015

yes, the package was renamed a while back

timcharper added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 7, 2016
README: surround-operator-alist -> evil-surround-operator-alist
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants