Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update time_bucket_ng() docs for the upcoming 2.6.0 release #652

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Dec 14, 2021

Conversation

afiskon
Copy link
Contributor

@afiskon afiskon commented Dec 13, 2021

Description

  • State that monthly buckets in CAGGs are going to be available since 2.6.0
  • Explicitly state that CAGG that uses an experimental function should be dropped and replaced in the feature

Version

Which documentation version does this PR apply to?

  • Latest (Default)
  • Version 1.7
  • Older [specify]

Links

This PR adds the documentation for timescale/timescaledb#3753

@afiskon afiskon self-assigned this Dec 13, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

Link to build for this PR: http://docs-dev.timescale.com/docs-monthly_buckets

@afiskon afiskon enabled auto-merge (squash) December 13, 2021 20:47
api/time_bucket_ng.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Loquacity and others added 2 commits December 14, 2021 13:28
Co-authored-by: Lana Brindley <github@lanabrindley.com>
api/time_bucket_ng.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Nuno Santos <nuno@timescale.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@NunoFilipeSantos NunoFilipeSantos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@afiskon afiskon dismissed Loquacity’s stale review December 14, 2021 12:01

The suggested changes were applied.

@afiskon afiskon merged commit 239f2be into latest Dec 14, 2021
@afiskon afiskon deleted the monthly_buckets branch December 14, 2021 12:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants