Some tests did not pass

[iajzenszmi]

now 0.01: Time: 0:00:06 (101 iterations)
Testing rounding (#300)
Progress: 100%|██████████████████████████| Time: 0:00:06
percentage: 100.0
Test Summary: | Pass Fail Total Time
Core | 102 1 103 2m48.1s
ERROR: LoadError: Some tests did not pass: 102 passed, 1 failed, 0 errored, 0 broken.
in expression starting at /home/ian/.julia/packages/ProgressMeter/dMfiC/test/runtests.jl:9
ERROR: Package ProgressMeter errored during testing

[MarcMush]

What test is failing? Is it the performance test? It is not very reliable (#219)

[iajzenszmi]

Progress: 100%|██████████████████████████| Time: 0:00:07
Core: Test Failed at /home/ian/.julia/packages/ProgressMeter/dMfiC/test/core.jl:51
Expression: #= /home/ian/.julia/packages/ProgressMeter/dMfiC/test/core.jl:51 =# @Elapsed(prog_perf(10 ^ 7)) < 9 * #= /home/ian/.julia/packages/ProgressMeter/dMfiC/test/core.jl:51 =# @Elapsed(noprog_perf(10 ^ 7))
Evaluated: 7.015894863 < 0.156777642.
The prog_perf test is problematic here.

Stacktrace:
[1] macro expansion
@ ~/.julia/juliaup/julia-1.10.3+0.x64.linux.gnu/share/julia/stdlib/v1.10/Test/src/Test.jl:672 [inlined]
[2] top-level scope

[MarcMush]

That's an annoying one, the number 9 chosen is arbitrary for deciding what performance hit is acceptable
It never passes on my reasonably performant and recent windows machine

[MarcMush]

However 9s seem very long so there might be a problem somewhere