Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't use update predictor when step size is zero #202

Merged

Conversation

IanButterworth
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #201

cc. @vancleve

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 8, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #202 (943aef8) into master (b4c75bb) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #202   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.31%   96.32%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines         489      490    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits          471      472    +1     
  Misses         18       18           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/ProgressMeter.jl 96.32% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b4c75bb...943aef8. Read the comment docs.

@IanButterworth IanButterworth merged commit dfa86be into timholy:master May 9, 2021
@IanButterworth IanButterworth deleted the ib/fix_zero_step_updates branch May 9, 2021 03:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

No output for updates with step=0
1 participant