Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prov:Removal and prov:Insertion (should not be, but are) equivalent #7

Open
timrdf opened this issue Jun 26, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@timrdf
Copy link
Owner

timrdf commented Jun 26, 2015

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2015May/0018.html

In the ontology at http://www.w3.org/ns/prov, the property 
prov:dictionary has domain prov:Removal and prov:Insertion. 
Additionally, prov:Removal and prov:Insertion both have a restriction 
owl:someValuesFrom on property prov:dictionary.

This makes prov:Removal and prov:Insertion equivalent.

Probably, the intention was to say:

prov:dictionary  rdfs:domain  [
     a  owl:Class;
     owl:unionOf  (prov:Insertion prov:Removal)
] .
-- 
Antoine Zimmermann
@timrdf timrdf added the bug label Jun 26, 2015
@timrdf
Copy link
Owner Author

timrdf commented Jun 26, 2015

See the namespace map for an illustration of how prov-dict tucks into the prov namespace with the other documents.

PROV-errata describes how to get an entry into the W3C page.

@timrdf
Copy link
Owner Author

timrdf commented Jun 26, 2015

Caught dictionary/prov-dictionary.owl/.ttl up from references to version 20130312 to references to version 20130430 -- hard linking from namespace/prov-dictionary.owl/ttl back into the original locations (with this commit)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant