Data Doesn't seem to be accurate in Nature (Please check below quarterly graph and then my profile)

[ChintzRuparel]

[iProdigy]

The last data point represents 2022-Q4. Q4 started on October 1st, so 49 commits in one week appears is reported by this visualization. That said, while this may clear up some confusion, github claims you have had 61 commits in October, so there is still some discrepancy (may be attributable to timezones, but will investigate)

Edit: it appears github's counting is wrong. For your Image-Processing repo, this visualization counts 11 commits. Your github profile says 14 commits, but if you click on it, only 11 commits are shown. For your Machine-Learning repo, this visualization counts 6 commits while github claims 7 (but clicking only shows 6 commits). And so on. If you're curious, these are all the commits that this visualization identifies for Q4: https://gist.github.com/iProdigy/4c7888d052a0f45fac53238c616c6e9f

In short, the graph produced is accurate.

[ChintzRuparel]

Hey @iProdigy,

Woah! The explanation and the point was as clear as possible. This waved off all the confusion I had.
The both repositories showing less number of commits than actual was because of Jupyter Notebook pushes are counted as one. Hence sparking this confusion.

Thanks a lot!
Do drop me if you wanna collaborate on some project!

Regards and Thanks,
@ChintzRuparel

[ChintzRuparel]

Hey @iProdigy,

The QUERY has been resolved.
This issue stands as closed.

Regards and Thanks,
@ChintzRuparel