Improve test cases to check for the positive case as well

[ackerleytng]

Hope you like this!

[tirkarthi]

Thanks @ackerleytng. This looks great and the tests are much nicer and robust now. Thanks for the reserved namespace too with useful information. Thanks a lot for the contribution. Merged 👍

[ackerleytng]

Will you be putting this on clojars? Would like to use this for my project!

[tirkarthi]

Sure, I will push a release tonight or before Monday.

[ackerleytng]

Thanks! I'm actually working on a version of the validator that takes a predicate instead of a list of regexes or numbers. Still need to work on test cases, might be able to put up a pull request by tomorrow!

[tirkarthi]

That's great. Please keep in the existing key :regexes and consider adding a new optional key like :predicates to the function. Feel free to open a new issue to discuss about this since this PR is merged.