fix: hacky fix for files with subloops

[tlambert03]

This is a proof-of-principle hacky fix for the file that @aaristov shared in #190

@aaristov, if you're inclined, feel free to check out this branch and see if it works for you. I won't be merging this until I understand a bit better how that file ended up with this structure.

closes #190

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 8 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (8b2fd66) 95.49% compared to head (837b356) 95.16%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/nd2/_parse/_parse.py	27.27%	8 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #193      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.49%   95.16%   -0.33%     
==========================================
  Files          17       17              
  Lines        2308     2318      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         2204     2206       +2     
- Misses        104      112       +8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #193 will not alter performance

_{Comparing subloops (837b356) with main (8b2fd66)}

Summary

✅ 13 untouched benchmarks

[aaristov]

Hi Talley,

Just to let you know that you did a fantastic job and this branch works really well with the paused acquisitions, so I'd be happy to see it merged into production. Let me know if you need something before this happens.

Best
Andrey

[tlambert03]

Thanks @aaristov. I did end up getting some feedback from the folks at Laboratory Imaging, so I have a bit more info now on how to "properly" handle this unusual case. But, that proper way is even more convoluted 😂 hence my delay. But, if this is better than nothing, and you'd like to see it in, perhaps I'll just cut a release with this version, and then make more robust in a follow up.