Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adapt to changes in the lsp server. #322

Merged
merged 10 commits into from Jan 31, 2024
Merged

Adapt to changes in the lsp server. #322

merged 10 commits into from Jan 31, 2024

Conversation

kape1395
Copy link
Collaborator

@kape1395 kape1395 commented Jan 22, 2024

  • Updated the proof step icons to use the material icons.
  • Rewrote the proof step details panel to use react and improved the style.
  • Adapted to the changes in the LSP server.

Signed-off-by: Karolis Petrauskas <k.petrauskas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Karolis Petrauskas <k.petrauskas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Karolis Petrauskas <k.petrauskas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Karolis Petrauskas <k.petrauskas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Karolis Petrauskas <k.petrauskas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Karolis Petrauskas <k.petrauskas@gmail.com>
@kape1395 kape1395 marked this pull request as ready for review January 28, 2024 08:50
Signed-off-by: Karolis Petrauskas <k.petrauskas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Karolis Petrauskas <k.petrauskas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Karolis Petrauskas <k.petrauskas@gmail.com>
@kape1395
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@lemmy, should I wait for a review or merge it right away?

Makefile Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
all: compile

compile:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm no big fan of the typescript/javascript build, but this makefile is not complete. IMO, this is more confusing then helping.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added this as a reminder for myself, but you are right; that might be confusing for others. I will remove it, as I'm not sure how to make it more complete.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Empty file?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought of keeping the file structure similar in all components. But I will remove it to decrease confusion :)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Empty file?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same as above.

Signed-off-by: Karolis Petrauskas <k.petrauskas@gmail.com>
@kape1395 kape1395 merged commit 766ee98 into master Jan 31, 2024
7 checks passed
@kape1395 kape1395 deleted the tlaps-proof-state-v2 branch January 31, 2024 14:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants