-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Let's document: cups #6597
Comments
We usually use |
I might want to do |
@pixelcmtd You might want to update the list |
I might want to write for
in a way that complies with our current style guide. |
If there's enough space left in the page, I'd go with this: - Enable remote administration:
`cupsctl --remote-admin`
- Disable remote administration:
`cupsctl --no-remote-admin` But if not you could combine it: - Enable or disable remote administration:
`cupsctl --remote-admin|--no-remote-admin` But I'm not actually sure if documenting both is even necessary. On of those has to be the default, right? We should we document it if it doesn't change anything? |
@kbdharun @sebastiaanspeck |
AFAIK we generally don't add deprecated commands. Or do we add and document them as deprecated? |
Nice catch @sebastiaanspeck (thanks for reopening). @vitorhcl minor suggestion in PR/commit descriptions it is suggested to use terms like "For #issue" or some other wording instead of " closes #issue", " fixes #issue" and " completes #issue" when there are remaining commands not having a page yet as GitHub detects these words automatically and closes the issue when your PR/commit is merged. |
Oooh, got it, thanks for the tip. |
[ ] cupsfilterDEPRECATEDThis list is not complete at all. Look at the official documentation for more.The list contains all CUPS commandsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: