Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't misdetect pycryptodome as pycrypto #198

Closed
tomato42 opened this issue Nov 2, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #408
Closed

Don't misdetect pycryptodome as pycrypto #198

tomato42 opened this issue Nov 2, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #408
Assignees
Labels
enhancement new feature to be implemented
Milestone

Comments

@tomato42
Copy link
Member

tomato42 commented Nov 2, 2017

pycryptodome is not compatible with pycrypto so the detection of the latter should identify if it's not the former and disable the pycrypto wrappers in case it is

@tomato42 tomato42 added good first issue relatively simple changes, good for first time contributors enhancement new feature to be implemented help wanted labels Nov 2, 2017
@tomato42 tomato42 added this to the v1.0.0 milestone Jul 31, 2018
@tomato42 tomato42 pinned this issue Jan 25, 2019
@tomato42 tomato42 modified the milestones: v1.0.0, v0.8.0 Jan 25, 2019
tomato42 added a commit that referenced this issue May 25, 2020
tomato42 added a commit that referenced this issue May 25, 2020
tomato42 added a commit that referenced this issue May 25, 2020
@tomato42 tomato42 self-assigned this May 25, 2020
@tomato42 tomato42 removed good first issue relatively simple changes, good for first time contributors help wanted labels May 25, 2020
tomato42 added a commit that referenced this issue May 26, 2020
@tomato42 tomato42 unpinned this issue May 26, 2020
tomato42 added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 1, 2020
fixes #198

backport of e92ba72 from master
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement new feature to be implemented
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant