Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust and generalize cached_info guidance. #270

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Aug 17, 2020

Conversation

davidben
Copy link
Collaborator

Now that we've switched to encrypting the entire ClientHello, there's
nothing wrong with cached_info in ClientHelloOuter, provided it's based
on the public name rather than the inner name. And, more generally,
name-specific extensions take some care.

Replace the prohibition with more general guidance in Security
Considerations, with cached_info merely being an example.

This addresses issue #266.

Now that we've switched to encrypting the entire ClientHello, there's
nothing wrong with cached_info in ClientHelloOuter, provided it's based
on the public name rather than the inner name. And, more generally,
name-specific extensions take some care.

Replace the prohibition with more general guidance in Security
Considerations, with cached_info merely being an example.

This addresses issue tlswg#266.
Copy link
Collaborator

@chris-wood chris-wood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with a couple suggestions -- thanks!

draft-ietf-tls-esni.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
draft-ietf-tls-esni.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
draft-ietf-tls-esni.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
davidben and others added 3 commits August 17, 2020 16:37
Co-authored-by: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
Co-authored-by: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
Co-authored-by: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants