Explicitly provide integrity for the CID #143
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
seanturner
reviewed
Apr 25, 2020
| on multiple records in the same datagram. | ||
|
|
||
| Note that this design is different from the additional data | ||
| calculation for DTLS 1.2 and for DTLS 1.2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this missing "with Connection ID." from the end of the last sentence?
|
Closing since #148 was merged. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is in response to @hanno-arm pointing out that otherwise the CID is not protected.
With that said, I think it might be simpler to simply forbid CID elision.