Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Renaming HandshakeType names in IANA request #265

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jan 22, 2022
Merged

Renaming HandshakeType names in IANA request #265

merged 3 commits into from Jan 22, 2022

Conversation

seanturner
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves #264.

Copy link
Contributor

@kaduk kaduk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want anything in the prose about how the RequestConnectionId structure is the message contents when the HandshakeType is request_connection_id/etc.?
Also update Appendix A.2?

@seanturner
Copy link
Contributor Author

As far as referring to the snake case in the main body, I went and looked at RFC 8446 and it does not refer to the snake case. I tend to think that if we make the change in 5.2 and A.2, that should be enough breadcrumbs for people to figure it out.

I put them in the same order as they are in the registry and moved up new_session_ticket.

Triple check this change please.

@chris-wood chris-wood merged commit 8c06d27 into tlswg:master Jan 22, 2022
case encrypted_extensions: EncryptedExtensions;
case certificate_request: CertificateRequest;
case request_connection_id: RequestedConnectionId;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this be just "RequestConnectionId", not "Requested"?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes fixing this too.

@@ -1130,12 +1132,14 @@ fragmentation, DTLS modifies the TLS 1.3 handshake header:
case client_hello: ClientHello;
case server_hello: ServerHello;
case end_of_early_data: EndOfEarlyData;
case new_session_ticket: NewSessionTicket;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see NST (4) as before EOED (5) in the registry.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Were we planning to order these by codepoint value in the final RFC?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes ... will submit a new PR now to reorder

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rename TLS HandshakeTypes
3 participants